Example sentences of "[verb] by [art] justices " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1827 " Samuel Lamont is instructed by the Justices of the Peace to survey the Baker 's stock of Bread occasionally , and weigh their loaves , and report the weight and price of each loaf … " |
| 2 | His argument that his conduct was not in any sense ‘ aimed at ’ the policeman , as apparently required by the earlier decision , was accepted by the justices , who dismissed the prosecution . |
| 3 | In the family proceedings court an appointment may be made by a justices ' clerk . |
| 4 | It was impossible to say that the order made by the justices had any foundation in law and they had erred in principle in making it ; MacDougall v. Knight [ 1889 ] A.C. 194 , Scott v. Scott [ 1913 ] A.C.417 , Att. -Gen. v. Leveller Magazine Ltd . |
| 5 | In the premises , the duration of the order made by the justices was excessive . |
| 6 | ( 6 ) The only finding of fact in respect of physical harm made by the justices ( ‘ He has made threats of physical harm to himself and others ’ ) related to a time when the child was in secure accommodation . |
| 7 | So in effect the order made by the justices was three months less 13 days . |
| 8 | On 7 December 1990 a secure accommodation order was made by the justices under section 21A of the Child Care Act 1980 . |
| 9 | An informal discussion took place between the advocates with the clerk of the court as to the use that could be made by the justices of those statements and that medical report . |
| 10 | Mr. Marston says that the court therefore has material on which it could confirm the order made by the justices , notwithstanding the way they dealt with the matter . |
| 11 | Indeed , it is conceded by the representatives of the parties to this appeal that an order made in the terms made by the justices was not open to them in as much as it did not impinge upon the parental responsibility of the parent concerned and impinged only upon contact between the parents themselves . |
| 12 | An interim care order gives more flexibility to the plaintiffs as well as the other advantages of a care order and although , as I said at the outset , one rarely interferes with an interim order , in the present case I am less disinclined to interfere because of the initial invalidity of part of the order made by the justices . |
| 13 | I turn then to consider whether this order for costs made by the justices was justified and whether it is one with which this court can interfere , having regard to the familiar principles of G. v. G. ( Minors : Custody Appeal ) [ 1985 ] 1 W.L.R. 647 . |
| 14 | The children had been committed to the care of the local authority by the order made by the justices on 15 May 1991 . |
| 15 | These findings are also in line with figures produced by the Justices ' Clerks ' Society ( 1992 ) which we cited earlier , suggesting that for a given range of offence types , Crown Courts are very much more likely to resort to custody than magistrates courts , and to do so for longer . |
| 16 | ( b ) Powers of a justices ' clerk Certain functions of the court may be performed by a justices ' clerk who may in turn delegate these functions to any clerk of the court authorised for this purpose . |
| 17 | The local authority appealed against that part of the order by which the justices purported to direct that the guardian ad litem be allowed to have continued involvement with L. on the grounds , inter alia , that ( 1 ) the justices had no jurisdiction to attach a condition to the care order which had been agreed by the parties and approved by the justices ; ( 2 ) in the alternative , the justices had no jurisdiction to make the direction , because ( i ) it had the effect of fettering the discretion of the local authority in the exercise of its functions under section 33 of the Children Act 1989 , and ( ii ) the justices had no power to order the guardian ad litem to ‘ have continued involvement ’ once the proceedings had been concluded by the making of an order under section 41 of the Children Act 1989 ; and ( 3 ) the justices had no jurisdiction to make a direction which anticipated a further application before the court , the justices power to give directions in respect of future applications being confined to a prohibition of further specified applications under section 91(14) of the Children Act 1989 . |
| 18 | In the family proceedings court this power may be exercised by a justices ' clerk . |
| 19 | Disputes between parishes were settled by the justices of the peace at quarter sessions . |
| 20 | I hold that on an appeal to the High Court under the Children Act 1989 the only findings of fact and the only reasons that may be relied on to support the decision of the justices under appeal , are those announced by the justices in accordance with rule 21 . |
| 21 | The remand had been for the purpose of the issue being tried by the justices on the Monday . |
| 22 | It could only be determined by the justices upon whatever evidence was put before it , and the effect of that must then be put into perspective . |
| 23 | In the family proceedings court leave may be given by a justices ' clerk . |
| 24 | A direction may be given by a justices ' clerk . |
| 25 | Held , allowing the appeal , ( 1 ) that rule 21 of the Family Proceedings ( Children Act 1989 ) Rules 1991 required justices to give reasons and state their findings of fact on making orders under the Children Act 1989 ; that where a party appealed their order , justices could not remedy their failure to comply with rule 21 by supplying to the appellate court a more detailed statement of reasons and findings of fact ; and that , accordingly , the appellate court could only consider the reasons given by the justices at the time of the decision ( post , p. 527A–C , E–G ) . |
| 26 | I have already referred to the findings and the reasons given by the justices at the time that they announced their decision on 28 January 1992 . |