Example sentences of "[pron] go on to argue " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 I go on to argue that , despite the underlying regularities , the behaviour of an individual animal is only predictable when a lot is known about the conditions in which the animal has grown up .
2 This transformational stance , she goes on to argue , allows the ethnographer to have a personal discourse on aspects which are outside the usual limits of the body or corpus of collected material .
3 As she goes on to argue , ‘ The pronoun ‘ he ’ is an essential part of this description . ’
4 They go on to argue that the 1970s saw a new phase in the world economy , a development they call the new international division of labour .
5 They go on to argue that ‘ in the short-term the most likely approach to educational change is through enlarging the use of increasingly refined self-knowledge by particular institutions ’ .
6 But having done so , they go on to argue that experiences , being essentially mental , can not be properly ascribed to non-mental subjects , and immediately expose themselves to a question about the true identity of their bearers and the criteria under which experiences can be ascribed to them .
7 Having countered their own criticism , however , they go on to argue ( p.120 ) that CA 's " apparent analytical successes are dependent upon the analyst 's stepping beyond the methodological limits allowed by the underlying ethnomethodological principles " .
8 As a result they went on to argue for sole custody in step-parent situations on the assumption of children having one ‘ psychological parent ’ with whom they maintain a continuous relationship and bond .
9 The London Society implicitly recognises this when it goes on to argue that a DG would allow the president 's post to become part-time , thereby allowing the senior partner of a major practice to take it on .
10 It goes on to argue that scientists do not know enough about natural fluctuations in fish populations in the wild to be able to advise on how many can safely be taken at any time .
11 He goes on to argue that the bourgeoisie have always used sections from within the ‘ dangerous classes ’ to control those who are overtly troublesome , perhaps following the maxim that ‘ it takes a thief to catch a thief ’ , when he argues : ‘ for one and a half centuries the bourgeoisie offered the following choices : you can go to prison or join the Army ; you can go to prison or go to the colonies ; you can go to prison or you can join the police ’ ( ibid. 23 ) .
12 Acknowledging the apparent opposition between these two terms , he goes on to argue , and to show from historical evidence , that throughout the nineteenth century , and into the early twentieth , much of the central function of criticism was carried by literary and cultural journalism , most of it , admittedly , of a more spacious and literate order than is common today .
13 He goes on to argue that the reality is different from the rhetoric .
14 He goes on to argue that the emergence of organised crime networks is bound to happen in a capitalist system .
15 He goes on to argue that as the right side of the brain has no language capacity , the knowledge it acquires can not be put into words : this may explain the failure of his attempts to do so .
16 He goes on to argue that these fantasies are not as personal , not as individual as at first appears , since they are such fundamental , childhood fantasies as castration fears , oedipal fears , and so on .
17 He goes on to argue that the situational theory , the defence of established institutions , most closely meets these criteria .
18 He goes on to argue that :
19 He goes on to argue that we can learn to cope with the anxiety associated with an anticipated event or with a recent unanticipated event by mastering progressively greater amounts of stress .
20 He went on to argue against sending alien rabbis ( chiefly eager volunteers from the newly-formed Council of Orthodox Rabbis from Germany , Austria and Czechoslovakia ) around the country when they would need police permits every time they entered a protected area .
21 He went on to argue that the bill violated fiscal discipline and would have destroyed jobs and undermined small businesses .
22 He went on to argue that the key to avoiding
23 Nevertheless , it went on to argue that a higher age of consent was necessary to protect the young from ‘ attentions and pressures of an undesirable kind ’ .
  Next page