Example sentences of "[art] [noun] " in BNC.

  Previous page   Next page
No Sentence
31 Fold the interlining back and lockstitch it to the wrong side of the curtains in the same way as for the lining in Lined Curtains , but stitch two vertical rows for each width of fabric at equal distances apart and along all seams .
32 Smooth the interlining back and tack the outer edges of bump to the sides of the curtain all around .
33 Finish off the sides by turning them in to the wrong side on the creaselines , with the interlining .
34 Lay the curtain out flat with the interlining uppermost and apply the hemmed lining to it in the same way as for Lined Curtains , but lockstitching along the same lines as the interlining and along all seams .
35 Lay the curtain out flat with the interlining uppermost and apply the hemmed lining to it in the same way as for Lined Curtains , but lockstitching along the same lines as the interlining and along all seams .
36 Then apply the interlining to the buckram by pressing the bump turning allowance to the back , as with the pelmet fabric described above .
37 Then serge ( page 34 ) the turning allowance of the outer fabric to the turning of the interlining on the back of the pelmet and through the buckram , making sure no stitches show on the right side .
38 Other treatments adopt an over-simple solution to the problem , always preferring one source to another ; thus the algorithm of Hobbs ( 1976 ) looks at all intrasentential candidates before earlier sentences are considered at all , while Brennan , Friedman & Pollard ( 1987 ) prefer all candidates from the most recent sentence to ones from the current sentence .
39 In the language of computer software say , this would mean careful attention to the derivation of the algorithm before a line of code is written .
40 To address this difficulty the algorithm was changed to a depth-first one .
41 The algorithm is modified , since only some set of the higher probability letters are selected as candidates to be chosen between , instead of choosing between all possible candidates .
42 If all such letters are found , the algorithm checks whether the resulting string is a word ( i.e. the end-of-word flag is set at the tree-node reached by the search ) .
43 Whilst the algorithm detailed in Appendix D ( flowchart D3 ) was under development , it became clear that this representation was not the best for this particular structure .
44 The algorithm is used both for originally arranging the array , and to check whether a particular value is present .
45 However , as Livingstone and Hubel ( 1984 ) point out , they can not be computing colour according to the algorithm derived by Land .
46 As this encoded beam passes through a second optoelectronic array , the various stages of the algorithm are executed .
47 Classification by computer , howsoever sophisticated the algorithm , is not appropriate .
48 As this encoded beam passes through a second optoelectronic array , the various stages of the algorithm are executed .
49 Variable 1 — The complexity of the algorithm :
50 For this reason , the algorithm needs to scan backward as well as forward , and therefore takes twice as long as the simple algorithm .
51 Record the number of ’ strong ’ and ’ weak ’ overlaps associated with each word — worth 50 points and 1 point respectively ( NB — strictly speaking , it is inappropriate to talk of ’ strong overlaps ’ or ’ weak overlaps ’ in this context , but the terminology is used to indicate the consistency of the algorithm ) ;
52 How would the algorithm need to be altered if numbers were stored in fractional form ( as in problem 2.2 ) ?
53 Extend the algorithm to deal with a general dividend and divisor , and include a test for overflow ( i.e. when the quotient can not be represented in n bits ) .
54 It keeps a list , called OPEN , of nodes which the algorithm has found and which are not goals but whose children might be goals .
55 The algorithm examines every shallow state , which can be constructed by a short path from start , before it examines deeper states .
56 The algorithm has a new variable , S , whose value is such a pair .
57 Thus , the algorithm searches a space in which each node is a pair : ( N , LOp )
58 In one cycle , the algorithm takes one operator out of the list LOp and applies it to N , so producing just one child .
59 The algorithm keeps a second list , called CLOSED , of nodes which have been expanded and removed from OPEN .
60 However , the chances are that , if you can really represent the search space optimally before calling the algorithm , then there is no need for search at all .
  Previous page   Next page