Example sentences of "dealing with [art] same [noun] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 ( b ) Express terms negative implied terms An express term in a lease generally excludes the possibility of the implication of a term dealing with the same subject matter as the implied term .
2 Within a month he knew almost as much about oven temperatures , controls , rising yeast and the correct mixture of flour to water as either of the two assistants , and as they were dealing with the same customers as Charlie was on his barrow , sales on both dropped only slightly during the first quarter .
3 Once again , it would seem clear that we are dealing with the same individual , whose militant nationalism it was deemed expedient to conceal .
4 The debt and the facility are under a single agreement or course of dealing with the same lender or group of lenders .
5 I wanted to work with people who are running a small firm , people who are dealing with the same problems as me because they 're running a small business . ’
6 Clearly , if a reader has had the experience of a holiday in France , or a visit to a factory , or of owning a pet , or of experiencing the death of a loved person or animal , this direct experience will be brought to a story or information book dealing with the same matters .
7 A hearing might be adjourned in order to be combined with another similar reference dealing with the same school and the same stage of education .
8 — From this it follows that we can not be dealing with the same concept of experience here .
9 Which means when you do business with ANZ you can be sure of dealing with the same bank at both ends of the transaction .
10 Even where the name is recorded early on , however , we can not be sure that we are dealing with the same site , bearing in mind the movement implied above .
11 Another question to consider is whether you have any other materials dealing with the same topic .
12 For example , it may become necessary to reject information which was initially taken to be reliable and important enough to interpret and organise subsequent information dealing with the same topic .
13 This was followed in the case of Ellen Street Estates Ltd. v. The Minister of Health ( C.A. , 1934 ) where the court found that it was impossible for Parliament to enact that , in a subsequent statute dealing with the same subject-matter , there should be no implied repeal .
14 The Legislature can not , according to our constitution , bind itself as to the form of subsequent legislation , and it is impossible for Parliament to enact that in a subsequent statute dealing with the same subject-matter there can be no implied repeal .
15 One may look not only at the rest of the section in which the word appears but at the statute as a whole , and even at earlier legislation dealing with the same subject-matter — for it is assumed that when Parliament passed an Act , it probably had the earlier legislation in mind , and probably intended to use words with the same meaning as before .
16 The situations envisaged by that subsection seem to me well illustrated by Bank of England v. Riley [ 1992 ] 2 W.L.R. 840 , which was dealing with the same words in another section of the same Act .
17 The previous act was in nineteen seventy , and indeed it was called ‘ The Handicapped Children Act ’ , but this year , in fact at the end of this year , there was a new act passed ‘ The Education Act of Nineteen Eighty One ’ , which refers to children with special educational needs , so we 're really dealing with the same group , but describing them somewhat differently .
  Next page