Example sentences of "exercise [pos pn] [noun sg] [to-vb] the " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | It also applies where the buyer exercises his right to reject the goods and treat the contract as repudiated because of a breach of condition . |
| 2 | A ‘ worst ’ scenario could include the creation of our document , in individualistic form by a user who chooses to exercise his/her ability to keep the document ‘ personal ’ , only accessible to those to whom it is directly mailed . |
| 3 | The Special Commissioner was therefore entitled to exercise his discretion to exclude the testimony under s 5(3) of the Civil Evidence Act 1972 . |
| 4 | In more questioning times , with the historian seeking to exercise his right to examine the past , people have tried to explain why wars occur . |
| 5 | To exercise his right to treat the contract as repudiated by the seller 's repudiatory breach , the buyer must inform the seller that he regards the contract as at an end . |
| 6 | Where there is no such interrelation , as where the landlord does not have to serve a notice in order to exercise his right to review the rent , the mere existence of a tenant 's break-clause will not lead the court to impose time limits on the landlord ( Woodhouse ( Edwin ) Trustee Co Ltd v Sheffield Brick Co plc ( 1983 ) 270 EG 548 ) . |
| 7 | Despite what the EAT in the Sen case go on to say about the Riley decision , it is submitted that it was an established rule of law as a result of that and other decisions that where an applicant instructs solicitors or advisors to act on his/her behalf and through their default the claim is presented out of time , the tribunal would not have exercised their discretion to allow the claim in . |
| 8 | When the negotiations were concluded , the directors exercised their right to buy the shares and in so doing made a profit . |
| 9 | In 1992 , following opportunities for conversion of 5¾ per cent Convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares and 8¾ per cent Convertible Unsecured Loan Stock 1996/2001 , the Company exercised its right to convert the outstanding convertible securities into ordinary shares . |
| 10 | By re-amended notice of appeal dated 30 August 1991 the defendants sought an order to set aside or vary the judge 's order or to order a retrial and sought leave to adduce fresh evidence on the grounds , inter alia , ( 1 ) that the judge had erred in law in failing to take into account ( a ) the lack of a penal notice on the order which it was claimed that the appellants had breached ; and ( b ) the plaintiff 's delay of 18 months in applying for the committal order ; ( 2 ) that the judge 's decision was arrived at without regard to fresh evidence which the defendants had obtained since the hearing , part of which related to matters subsequent to the hearing and the remainder of which could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence ; which , if given , would probably have had an important influence on the result , which was credible and which should , therefore , be admitted ; ( 3 ) that , alternatively , the court should exercise its discretion to admit the fresh evidence as the liberty of the defendants was at risk ; and ( 4 ) that the sentence imposed was excessive . |
| 11 | The father appealed by notice of appeal dated 30 March 1992 on the grounds ( 1 ) that the judge had erred in finding that the removal of the child by the mother was not wrongful within the meaning of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction by finding that the removal was neither in breach of the rights of custody of the father nor of the mother nor of the Ontario court ; and ( 2 ) that the judge erred in finding that the mother had established that there was a grave risk that the return of the child to Ontario would place him in an intolerable situation and further that the judge would not exercise his discretion to order the return of the child to Ontario . |
| 12 | Further , the appellant complains that by ruling in the way that he did on the main issue , the assistant recorder effectively left before the jury evidence prejudicial to the appellant which was relevant to counts 1 and 6 only : had he ruled in favour of the appellant on the motion to quash then he would have had to consider the matter and ( by inference ) would have exercised his discretion to discharge the jury and order a new trial on the remaining counts . |
| 13 | Further , if s 284 did apply , then the judge should have exercised his discretion to ratify the transaction , as the section permits . |
| 14 | In return for the offeror agreeing to procure that the accepting shareholders are paid the requisite amount of cash , the accepting shareholders exercise their right to nominate the merchant bank , or as it may direct ( ie sub-underwriters ) , as the person to whom the shares are to be allotted ; and |