Example sentences of "they share [art] same [noun sg] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | Most people in bands have quite similar backgrounds and I reckon a lot of them shared the same experience as I did . |
| 2 | He was interested to find that they shared the same distrust , perhaps the same revulsion . |
| 3 | The difference was , of course , that they shared the same land mass , and were directly connected to each other by transcontinental tracks . |
| 4 | They shared the same sense of humour as long as they kept off delicate subjects like sexism . |
| 5 | They shared the same paynote and were self-selected . |
| 6 | They nearly always ate together ; they gave each other all they had that was especially valuable ; they shared the same house , slept under the same roof . " |
| 7 | and they shared the same manager . |
| 8 | They shared the same cigarette and frolicked in the pool . |
| 9 | They may disagree with each other profoundly , and compete to outdo each other relentlessly , but they share the same notion of the contest and adhere , more or less , to the same rules . |
| 10 | Our own genes cooperate with one another , not because they are our own but because they share the same outlet — sperm or egg — into the future . |
| 11 | yeah , the , the , the erm , they share the same school gate |
| 12 | In many great collections , you can tell that all the items are related , by the way they share the same style of presentation . |
| 13 | However , utterances of ( 38 ) -(40) and the like can in fact convey a great deal : ( 38 ) War is war ( 39 ) Either John will come or he wo n't ( 40 ) If he does it , he does it Note that these , by virtue of their logical forms ( respectively : x ( W(x) — W(x) ) ; p V p ; p — p ) are necessarily true ; ergo they share the same truth conditions , and the differences we feel to lie between them , as well as their communicative import , must be almost entirely due to their pragmatic implications . |
| 14 | It may possibly be , as it surely is in ( 22 ) , that , where a single entity is present to the mind of the speaker , the same speaker can not simultaneously entertain the idea of more than one referent corresponding to that entity ( though there may be certain problems for this view in the case of collective nouns such as government or congregation or quartet , for which see Chapter 8 ) ; however , it is much less obvious that , where there is assumed to be only a single referent , there should be only a single intensional entity present to the mind ; rather , it seems to us that the separation of the referential and the intensional elements is precisely what lies behind such examples as ( 23 ) ( from Searle , 1969 ) , or ( 24 ) : ( 23 ) Everest is Chomolungma ( 24 ) the sheriff did not know that he was Arthur 's brother In the latter sentence , of course , we are interested in the interpretation which has he co-referring with Arthur 's brother , and the reason that we do not find a reflexive in the final position is precisely that these two elements are distinct intensionally even though they share the same referent . |