Example sentences of "[noun] was excluded [prep] [noun] [prep] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | Philip James Cattlin ( ACA ) of 97 Judd Street , London having been found liable to disciplinary action under Bye-law 76(a) ( i ) in that he in London between 17 March 1992 and 15 September 1992 being sole proprietor of a firm of Chartered Accountants , failed to cause that firm to comply with an order of the Disciplinary Committee made on 17 March 1992 that it pay costs in the sum of £500 and having been found liable to disciplinary action under Bye-law 76(a) ( iv ) in that he in London between 14 August 1992 and 15 September 1992 failed to provide information required of him by the Investigation Committee on 14 August 1992 in exercise of its powers under Bye-law 80(a) and in that he in London between 19 May 1992 and 4 August 1992 failed to satisfy a judgment of the County Court that he pay a sum of £5,634 and having been found liable to disciplinary action under Bye-law 76(a) ( iv ) in that he in London between 7 January 1992 and 4 August 1992 failed to provide information required of him by the Investigation Committee in exercise of its powers under Bye-law 80(a) concerning a judgment of the County Court was excluded from membership of the Institute and ordered to pay £1,000 by way of costs . |
| 2 | Postgraduate education was excluded from eligibility for LEA discretionary grants ( it had been eligible under the 1962 Education Act ) . |
| 3 | ( FCA ) of , who had been found to be in breach of Bye-law 76(a) and liable to disciplinary action under Bye-law 76(a) ( i ) in that he at Grimsby between 6 March 1989 and 15 July 1991 whilst Financial Director of a limited company misappropriated monies totalling an amount in excess of £90,000 was excluded from membership of the Institute and ordered to pay £350 by way of costs |
| 4 | Michael William Beecheno ( ACA ) of 2 Tummons Gardens , South Norwood Hill , London having been found guilty of misconduct within the meaning of Bye-law 76(a) in force at the material time and liable to disciplinary action under Bye-law 76(a) ( i ) in that in London between 11 March 1991 and 14 March 1991 he improperly suggested that charges to his employers for temporary staff be increased and the additional sums be paid to him under the guise of consultancy fees was excluded from membership of the Institute and ordered to pay £500 by way of costs . |
| 5 | ( FCA ) of having been found liable to disciplinary action under Bye-law 76(a) ( i ) in that he in the Crown Court on 30 April 1992 was indicted and on his plea of guilty convicted on one count of conspiracy to defraud a limited company was excluded from membership of the Institute and ordered to pay £250 by way of costs . |
| 6 | If a noble was excluded from favour at court , his dependants might look elsewhere for a patron , and the noble 's following would thus be weakened . |
| 7 | ( FCA ) of who had been found to be in breach of Bye-law 76(a) and liable to disciplinary action under Bye-law 76(a) ( i ) in that he in London between 9 January 1991 and 30 October 1991 , whilst a partner in a firm of chartered accountants , misappropriated monies in excess of £300,000 was excluded from membership of the Institute and ordered to pay £350 by way of costs . |