Example sentences of "see [adv] [noun] [letter] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Mean single channel conductances at V c o m =-40 mV ( g - 4 ) and V c o m =infinity were 56 ( 6 ) pS and 155 ( 23 ) pS respectively , the mean value of E r e v was -84.2 ( 0.2 ) mV , and inward currents were not seen when V c o m was varied between -80 mV and -120 mV .
2 It can be expected that the court will consider the guidelines , or factors similar to those in the guidelines , in other cases ( see eg Woodman v Photo Trade Processing Ltd ( 1981 ) , unreported ) .
3 Express mention of the beneficial owner covenants will imply on the part of the assignor that the terms of the lease with regard to maintenance , decoration and repair have been complied with ; this may not be so especially if the husband has been absent from the property for some time ( see generally Butler v Mountview Estates [ 1951 ] 2 KB 563 ) .
4 ( See also Gilbert v Star Newspapers Co Ltd ( 1894 ) 11 TLR 4 and Frazer v Edwards ( 1905 ) MacG Cop Cas ( 1905 – 10 ) 10 . )
5 See also McCrone v IRC mentioned above .
6 Although it only contains a small number of members , we have here a distinct and interesting adjective type , which among other things strikingly illustrates the unconscious linguistic skill of ordinary speakers ( see also Appendix B Section 5 ) .
7 See also Appendix E for lexicon frequency counts of word shape .
8 Instead " the clause must be limited and modified to the extent necessary to enable effect to be given to the main object and intent of the contract " ( per Lord Denning in Sze Hai Tong Bank Ltd v Rambler Cycle Co Ltd [ 1959 ] AC 576 ; see also Alexander v Railway Executive [ 1951 ] 2 KB 882 ) .
9 See also R v Secretary for the Home Department , ex parte Thakrar [ 1974 ] QB 684 .
10 In Balston Ltd v Headline Fillers Ltd [ 1987 ] FSR 330 it appears that an express confidential information clause which sought to protect secrets other than " business secrets " ( in the narrow sense that that phrase is used in Faccenda Chicken v Fowler ; see pp78-9 below ) was subjected by Scott J to the restraint of trade doctrine ( see also Harman J in Systems Reliability Holdings plc v Smith [ 1990 ] IRL R 377 ) .
  Next page