Example sentences of "[noun sg] of appeal [verb] the " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 The Court of Appeal granted the injunctions on the ground that the extension had generated a second dispute , between the ISTC and the government , which was separate from the union 's dispute with the BSC , and not a trade dispute because the government was not the employer .
2 The Court of Appeal said the strike was not in the public interest .
3 The Court of Appeal reversed the High Court 's decision , and the Commissioner appealed to the Privy Council .
4 The Court of Appeal reversed the judge 's decision to refuse the injunctions sought .
5 520 the Court of Appeal affirmed the making of a disclosure order to which the privilege against self-incrimination applied but attached to the order a direction in the form utilised by Buckley J. in paragraph 33 of his order .
6 The Court of Appeal affirmed the existence of an implied duty not to prepare to compete and gave judgment for the plaintiffs .
7 The Court of Appeal overturned the lower court 's ruling , stating that because the actual sale of the works took place outside Germany , German copyright law ( of which droit de suite is a part ) was not applicable .
8 The Court of Appeal overturned the resultant conviction for theft on the ground , following Morris , that there had been no appropriation in England because the defendant had there taken possession of the krugerrands with the owner 's authority .
9 One of the more striking interventions by the courts in recent years came when the Court of Appeal overturned the decision by the Secretary of State for the Environment to allow the demolition of listed buildings in the City of London .
10 The Court of Appeal overturned the award but no clear guidance emerged from its judgment ( see p.34 ) .
11 In its formal reading of the judgment on March 27 , the Court of Appeal vindicated the three appeal judges , led by Lord Lane , who in 1987 had dismissed the mens ' appeals , saying that the scientific issues were not the same .
12 Lord Donaldson , Master of the Rolls , sitting with Lord Justices Nourse and Russell , yesterday reserved their judgment after Private Eye had rejected an offer from Mrs Sutcliffe to allow the Court of Appeal to set the amount of damages .
13 Both the trial judge and the Court of Appeal applied the law laid down by the Divisional Court of the Queen 's Bench Division in Reg. v. Commissioner for Local Administration , Ex parte Croydon London Borough Council [ 1989 ] 1 All E.R.
14 The Court of Appeal applied the restraint of trade doctrine and found that the agreement was reasonable .
15 The Court of Appeal rejected the defence argument that there must be actual violence or threats of violence for the offence to be classified as rape .
16 The Court of Appeal rejected the view that had previously held sway , namely that it was possible for any employee to work both ordinarily in Great Britain and outside it .
17 The Court of Appeal rejected the Council 's defence on the ground , not that the ticket changed hands too late , but that it was not a contractual document ; for no reasonable person would expect to find contractual terms in a document which was no more than a receipt for him to prove that he had paid and which in many instances ( i.e. in the absence of the attendant ) would not change hands until long after the contract was made .
18 Held , dismissing the appeal , ( 1 ) that the applications to the district judge and the application for judicial review of his decisions had all been made by the applicant in a criminal cause because they related to the manner in which the district court trials should proceed , and so his appeal was not from a judgment of the High Court judge in a civil cause or matter within section 13(2) ( a ) of the Ordinance ; and that , therefore , since no other provision had conferred jurisdiction on the Court of Appeal to entertain the appeal , that court had correctly declined to hear it ( post , pp. 256G , 260E–F , G–H ) .
19 By a respondent 's notice dated 21 January 1992 the foster mother sought to contend that the judge 's grant of leave under section 10(9) of the Act of 1989 should be affirmed on the grounds that if the Court of Appeal accepted the local authority 's test for the grant of leave to apply under section 10(9) the evidence justified the judge 's order .
20 In Bowen v. Hall , on rather similar facts , the Court of Appeal accepted the broader proposition and doubted whether Lumley v. Gye could in fact be based upon the narrower ground of enticement .
21 Fundamentally , despite the applicant 's unenviable position , the Court of Appeal lacked the temerity to disturb an order of the House of Lords :
22 The Court of Appeal took the view that it remained unclear whether the court had so resiled .
23 The Court of Appeal adopted the reasoning of Kerr L.J .
24 That uncertainty , acknowledged by Watkins L.J. , should , it is submitted , have provided a powerful reason for the Court of Appeal to allow the applicant to have a judgment by the court on the unresolved points , particularly as they had been previously argued before but had been unanswered by the court .
25 In view of today 's decision by the Court of Appeal to allow the appeal by Winston Silcott , may I ask whether you have received a request by the Home Secretary to make a statement on that matter ?
26 The Court of Appeal overruled the decision on the facts , but not this interpretation of the general law .
27 On 26 July the Court of Appeal overruled the Divisional Court and on 2 August , moving with impressive speed , Lords Wilberforce , Dip lock , Salmon , Russell and Dilhorne upheld the Court of Appeal .
28 McCann , in which the Court of Appeal reduced the sentence for a relatively minor burglary by an offender who had only one distant previous conviction , from two years ' imprisonment to nine months .
29 [ 1992 ] 2 W.L.R. 367 , 377–378 the Court of Appeal summarised the background to the provisions of the Act of 1986 relating to receivers :
30 However , the Court of Appeal gave the plaintiff his costs of the appeal because it was unlikely that the defendant would have allowed him to take out from the sum paid into court an amount equal to the increased amount the Court of Appeal eventually awarded him .
  Next page