Example sentences of "does [adv] [pers pn] [vb infin] [that] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | Does not he think that we are a bad example to tell people to act through the United Nations when we as a Government have failed to do so ? |
| 2 | Does not he feel that unwise comments such as those that he made do not help an already difficult situation ? |
| 3 | Why does not he admit that since last year 's Budget more than 500,000 people have been added to the dole queue ? |
| 4 | But does not he realise that throughout Scotland he and his cronies are seen as a ’ wee parcel of rogues in a nation who were bought and sold for English gold ’ ? |
| 5 | Does not he realise that there is a serious danger of recreating the student ferment of 1969 ? |
| 6 | Does not he realise that , in making his announcement , he has , to some extent , signed his political death warrant ? |
| 7 | Does not he recognise that it is a broadly based representative body in which it was open to the Conservative party to participate and that for him to call now for a debate , once its work is completed , is extraordinary ? |
| 8 | Does not he understand that it is action , not words , that the elderly , sick and disabled of Britain require of him ? |
| 9 | But look a little more deeply and you will see that something else has happened too ; if a number of people have gone down with the cold , does not it mean that a number of people have not gone down with the cold ? |
| 10 | Does not it mean that we are the party of hot money , not hot air ? |
| 11 | Does n't he remember that at the General Election the tabloids and so-called quality newspapers slaughtered Labour leader Neil Kinnock who did not have an affair with an actress or take freebie holidays ? |
| 12 | Does n't it mean that you 're presented with a set of faits accomplis ? |
| 13 | So , if erm so your , your , your principal complaint , I maybe wrong it maybe not your principal , look at page a hundred and twenty seven for your assistance , erm standard form of agreements restricted competitions , the service of the petitions or the agents provided so this is names and thereby restrict the competition as the agents them say erm then impose on that it was a regime etcetera , erm that the , the competitive the anti competitive one is your sub paragraph one is n't it ? , on page one , two , seven your saying look here is a of , of dictated through their bi-laws , a standard form that all agents must use , you say , erm , er that that restricts competition because it means that agents are free , or as free as they ought to be , erm to compete with each other or providing services to outside names , I follow that , I did n't say I except it , but I follow that entirely , erm , but does n't , does n't , if you 're right does n't it follow that the agreements are void ? |