Example sentences of "[pers pn] was held that [adj] [noun] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 See also Chief Constable of Grampian v. Aberdeen District Lit. , oil Board , 1979 S.L.T. ( Sh.Ct. ) 2 , where it was held that mere reiteration of the wording of s. 17(1) ( b ) of the Act was insufficient .
2 In the leading case of Lawrence ( 1981 ) it was held that reckless driving consists of driving which creates an obvious and serious risk of causing physical injury to some other person who might be happening to use the road or of doing substantial damage to property , and that the fault element is that the driver either failed to give any thought to the possibility of such a risk or , having recognized the existence of a risk , went on to take it .
3 It was held that that provision was sufficient to make time of the essence of the time limit for the landlord 's application .
4 In Stoneley v Richardson [ 1973 ] RTR 229 it was held that defective brakes do not have to be proved by an authorised examiner .
5 Manual workers made up a large proportion of the TUC membership , and the health of many of these was depicted as having been destroyed by their employment ; and , moreover , it was held that all workers had a right to a period of leisure in later life supported by-a full subsistence pension .
6 For example , in one case it was held that electrical contractors , as such , had no right to complain that a local authority had not followed proper tendering procedures in letting out a contract for the installation of central heating .
7 Moreover , the approach taken by their Lordships in George Mitchell does seem at variance with the Photo Production case where it was held that artificial distinctions should be rejected in favour of construction according to plain and natural meaning .
8 Gulliver , it was held that any profit made by a director as a result of the misuse of confidential information , which he had obtained by virtue of his position as an insider , was liable to account for that profit to the company .
9 Thus in Cointat v. Myham ( 1913 C.A. ) where the plaintiff bought bad meat in the Central London Meat Market , it was held that any warranty as to the fitness or quality of the meat was excluded , because there was an established custom of the market to that effect .
10 It was held that these remittances , in the hands of the mother , were assessable to income tax under Schedule D , Case V as being monies received in this country in respect of foreign possessions .
11 In R. W. Cairns Ltd. v. Busby East Church Kirk Session , 1985 S.L.T. 493 , it was held that proper specification is required in the statement of reasons for a decision .
12 There it was held that those persons who had access to inside information were required to observe the ‘ abstain or disclose ’ principle ie they had either to disclose the inside information which they held or abstain from trading .
13 It was held that this instruction was inadequate to prevent the commission of the offence ( under section 1 ) .
14 This was taken one step further in Stadium Finance v. Robbins where it was held that this requirement was not complied with .
15 Although claims in negligence for purely financial loss do not generally succeed , it was held that this claim by the owner against the nominated sub-contractor could succeed in negligence ( i.e. even though there was no contract between the owner and sub-contractor ) .
16 It was held that this claim was allowable .
17 It was held that this loss should be recoverable from the shipowners because they should reasonably have contemplated that the delay would have resulted in a loss .
18 On an appeal to the Court of Appeal [ 1992 ] Ch. 342 it was held that this statement should be produced subject to certain names and passages being omitted .
19 In Attorney General v Squire , it was held that obnoxious odours from pigs kept by the defendants , and arising from the number of animals , the place in which they were kept , and the food with which they were fed , were such as to create a public nuisance , and in Attorney General v Cole and Son noxious gases created by the defendant carrying on the trade of fat-melter were also held to be a public nuisance despite the fact that the defendant had carried on his trade , in a proper manner and in the same way for 30 years .
20 Thus in Barker v Hargreaves [ 1981 ] RTR 197 , it was held that excusable ignorance could be a defence in the case of latent defects under the Trade Description Act 1968 ( TDA ) .
21 Raym. 742 in which it was held that indebitatus assumpsit lay for money paid under the sentence of a court which had no jurisdiction .
22 For example , in Smith , Kline and French Laboratories Ltd. v Sterling Winthrop Group Ltd. [ 1976 ] , it was held that coloured capsules for drugs could be registered as trade marks .
23 In a New Zealand case , it was held that Jewish persons are protected by the phrase ‘ ethnic origins , ’ and there is no real reason to suppose that the law is not the same in Great Britain .
24 But , second , it was held that different principles applied in cases where the Crown brought a law enforcement action , in which an injunction was sought to restrain a subject from breaking a law where the breach would be harmful to the public or a section of it .
  Next page