Example sentences of "for the courts " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 The methods of the operation were absolutely necessary to gather evidence necessary for the courts , and were decided after full consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service .
2 But while Mr Schalck-Golodkowski 's innocence or guilt must remain a matter for the courts , the detention of his friend and lawyer , Mr Wolfgang Vogel , clearly was in breach of the law .
3 But while Mr Schalck-Golodkowski 's innocence or guilt must remain a matter for the courts , the detention of his friend and lawyer , Mr Wolfgang Vogel , clearly was in breach of the law .
4 In order to support this position , one has to accept : ( i ) that the intention — recklessness distinction is the most significant dividing line for serious injuries , more relevant than factors such as premeditation or provocation ; ( ii ) that this is a workable distinction for the courts , especially in impulsive crimes , where the definition of intention may be fulfilled by a momentary realization of what is happening ; ( iii ) that it is so significant that a difference in maximum penalties between life imprisonment and five years ' imprisonment is appropriate ; and ( iv ) that there is not a strong case for phrasing the offences in terms of endangerment rather than of causing physical harm .
5 For the courts to take upon themselves the task of making this determination is a stultifying , even a discrediting , exercise .
6 The point to make here is that if it is good enough for the courts to judge a publication as a whole then it would be perverse of a librarian to do otherwise in book selection .
7 It will always be hard for the courts to distinguish between what is harmful and what is merely unpleasant or challenging , but it is a task which society must confront for its own good .
8 This is the relevance of rules ; for the courts to embrace such an issue would be for them to breach the long-standing settlement with regard to the boundaries of parliamentary privilege ( see below , pp.113–19 ) and they would not do it .
9 whilst , if a privilege existed , it was up to the House to decide whether there had been a breach , the existence of the privilege in the first place was for the common law to decide and it was for the courts , and not the House , to declare the common law .
10 As a result of these value conflicts litigants had no respect for the courts and manipulated them .
11 It really is time for the courts to stamp down on motoring infringments .
12 When sport fails to deal adequately with the excesses of its performers , it is right and proper for the courts to take over .
13 Lord Justice Browne-Wilkinson said that it is now apparently accepted that it is for the courts to decide whether a privilege exists and for the House of Commons to decide whether such privilege has been infringed .
14 So , for The Courts she would wear the old black coat with the large pockets at the side holding the narrow strips of candy rock in one and the coppers in the other .
15 It occupies an area of approximately 20 hectares and includes an administration block for the courts and associated administrative staff .
16 So at the end of the day it must be for the courts to decide how to classify particular functions , and this can only be done on the basis of some normative judgment about the desirable scope of judicial review .
17 Once again , however , it might be replied that for the courts to seek to regulate the policy-formation process in this way would inevitably embroil them in undesirable political controversy .
18 But if the decisions involved are perceived as being too politically sensitive for the courts , some legislative intervention might be necessary to establish the desired framework of value judgments .
19 It seems clear that the principle that remedies are a matter for the courts of Member States and the principle of effective protection are , potentially at least , in conflict ; and that ultimately the legal system which creates a right must also control the way that right is protected .
20 Now , however , the current Master of the Rolls , Lord Donaldson , is the most influential figure and he favours a more modest role for the courts in this area than Lord Denning , in particular , would have wanted .
21 With very few exceptions the rule is that Parliament determines the maximum penalty and it is then for the courts , having heard the evidence , and seen the defendant in person , and heard what can be said in mitigation on his behalf , to decide upon the appropriate punishment in all the circumstances of the case .
22 No clear principles determine the allocation of disputes to these bodies although the greater the element of discretion and the more important the policy considerations , the less likely it is for the courts to take on the new area of responsibility .
23 The reform of censorship ( 1865 ) was based on the principle that it was for the courts to decide when the press had broken the law , and pre-publication censorship was significantly reduced .
24 The Act also contains guidance for the courts as to the factors which they should take into account in deciding whether any of the statutory exceptions to the presumption in favour of bail apply in a particular case .
25 One relatively recent approach which gained favour in the United States and Australia during the 1990s is based on the adoption of sentencing guide-lines for the courts .
26 If it is appropriate for the courts to adopt some kind of policy in order to protect government against itself ( and I can not say that the idea particularly appeals to me ) , it should be one that distributes the loss fairly across the public .
27 If the principle does exist that tax paid on a demand from the Crown when the tax was the subject of an ultra vires demand can be recovered as money had and received then , in my view , it is for the courts to declare it .
28 It is a planning problem , not a question for the courts .
29 But that will be a matter for the courts of [ Australia ] .
30 The question for the courts in these cases is whether the third party can escape from the effect of the documents that he or she has signed .
  Next page