Example sentences of "appeal [conj] [art] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 The orders in the particular case were to be reconsidered by the District Court , and there was a broad hint from the Court of Appeals that the production of documents and the examination of witnesses should be ordered to take place not in Germany but in the United States .
2 Instead he played off the resentment of the ‘ old court ’ at their humiliations and Charles IV 's frantic appeals that the French should save Godoy from the vengeance of his enemies against Ferdinand 's craving for French backing .
3 Consequently , the ‘ law ’ on the subject of Musgrove v. Pandelis ( strict liability for petrol in the tank of a car ) may depend upon the number of appeals that the client is prepared to take .
4 One was the normal powers available to local authorities , with the usual machinery for appeals and a public inquiry .
5 Research conclusions were that SBATs suffered a serious problem of non-attendance of claimants , that it ‘ required telepathic powers to understand ’ the reasoning in written decisions , that the informality with which proceedings were conducted led to inadequate enquiry into appeals and an imbalance between claimants and the SBC 's presenting officers , which rendered SBATs partial in their decision making .
6 A report prompted by the growing concern at the number of planning appeals and the role of the Department of the Environment in overturning the decisions of local government on large and controversial developments .
7 The major sources of appeals are the county courts which generate about 300 final appeals and the QBD of the High Court which generates about 400 final appeals .
8 Appeals If an Industrial Tribunal 's decision goes against you , you can only appeal in limited circumstances .
9 A Department of Environment spokesman said : ‘ There will be a system for appeals but the details of how it will work have not yet been finalised . ’
10 This is the reason for the periodic letters asking for contributions to such appeals as the repair of Igtham Mote in Kent or for the restoration of Stowe Landscape Gardens in Buckinghamshire .
11 In civil cases a precondition to any appeal from the Court of Appeal to the House of Lords is the obtaining of leave from either the Court of Appeal or the Appeal Committee of the House of Lords , which consists of three Law Lords .
12 The question raised by the petition is whether an order made by the Court of Appeal of New Zealand on 4 October 1991 dismissing the petitioner 's action was a final order which entitled the petitioner to appeal as of right to Her Majesty in Council or whether the order was an interlocutory order against which there was no appeal save with the leave of the Court of Appeal or the grant of special leave by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council .
13 There was no decision of the Court of Appeal or the House of Lords on the point .
14 Since 1977 , no judge sitting in the High Court , or the Court of Appeal or the House of Lords ( as a Law Lord ) had formerly been a Member of the House of Commons .
15 For an appeal to the House of Lords , either the Court of Appeal or the House of Lords must give leave .
16 ‘ ( a ) as of right , from any final judgment of the Court of Appeal where the matter in dispute on the appeal amounts to or is of the value of 5,000 New Zealand dollars or upwards , or where the appeal involves , directly or indirectly , some claim or question to or respecting property or some civil right amounting to or of the value of 5,000 New Zealand dollars or upwards ; and ( b ) at the discretion of the Court of Appeal from any other judgment of that court , whether final or interlocutory , if , in the opinion of that court , the question involved in the appeal is one which by reason of its great general or public importance , or otherwise , ought to be submitted to His Majesty in Council for decision .
17 But there can be no logic in depriving a litigant of a right of appeal where the final hearing is divided into parts by analogy with the decisions whereby a frivolous or vexatious litigant is deprived of a right to any hearing .
18 In In re Leighton 's Conveyance [ 1937 ] Ch. 149 it was held by the Court of Appeal that a statutory provision providing that ‘ a poor person shall not be ordered to pay any costs ’ did not affect a mortgagee litigant 's right to add his litigation costs to the mortgage security .
19 In Low v. Kincardine Licensing Court , 1974 S.L.T. ( Sh.Ct. ) 54 , it was held to be a relevant ground of appeal that a rule of natural justice that no interested party should have an opportunity to confer with the licensing court outwith the presence of another party to the cause was broken .
20 The decision is discussed more fully below , but it is of importance in the present context because the House of Lords explicitly disapproved of statements made in the Court of Appeal that a court could exercise a general power to consider whether the decision reached was fair and reasonable .
21 In Genentech Inc. " s Patent [ 1989 ] , it was held , inter alia , in the Court of Appeal that a patent which claimed the practical application of a discovery did not relate to the discovery as such and was not excluded by section 1(2) of the Patents Act 1977 even if the practical application might be obvious once the discovery had been made .
22 Indeed , it is conceded by the representatives of the parties to this appeal that an order made in the terms made by the justices was not open to them in as much as it did not impinge upon the parental responsibility of the parent concerned and impinged only upon contact between the parents themselves .
23 The taxpayer was unsuccessful in his appeal that the Commissioners ' conclusion was not justified by the facts before them .
24 But it has such appeal that the casinos are reporting more feverish betting activity than they 've known in a long time .
25 It has been held by the Court of Appeal that the privilege against self-incrimination can be invoked in this context where , accepting the facts as alleged by the plaintiff , there is a reasonable apprehension on the part of the defendant that he might be prosecuted in the United Kingdom .
26 There had earlier been an interim order which lasted for some 13 days up to 23 December 1991 and it is common ground on this appeal that the 13 days must by reason of the regulations be subtracted from the three months .
27 It is against that background that I return to the conclusion of the majority of the Court of Appeal that the mere fact that Wickes might be able to advance such an argument founded upon article 30 , which was at least not a groundless argument , compelled the Court of Appeal to require an undertaking in damages from the council .
28 In proceedings against him by the Attorney-General it was held in the Court of Appeal that the charge was unlawful and that the defendant was under no obligation to pay it .
29 It was held by Avory J. and the Court of Appeal that the condition was illegal .
30 It was held both by Avory J. and the Court of Appeal that the payment in terms of the unlawful condition was not voluntary having been made for the purpose of obtaining the licence and could therefore be recovered as in Morgan v. Palmer , 2 B. & C. 729 .
  Next page