Example sentences of "[conj] [verb] liability for [noun sg] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Where a contract term or notice purports to exclude or restrict liability for negligence a person 's agreement to or awareness of it is not of itself to be taken as indicating his voluntary acceptance of any risk .
2 Where a contract term or notice purports to exclude or restrict liability for negligence a person 's agreement to or awareness of it is not of itself to be taken as indicating his voluntary acceptance of any risk .
3 This states that in respect of loss or damage other than arising from death or personal injury ‘ a person can not so exclude or restrict liability for negligence except in so far as the term or notice satisfies the requirement of reasonableness ’ .
4 Sections 2 to 4 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act apply to contractual terms or notices which attempt to exclude or restrict liability for negligence and breach of contract .
5 Section 2(3) states : " Where a contract term or notice purports to exclude or restrict liability for negligence a person 's agreement to or awareness of it is not of itself to be taken as indicating his voluntary acceptance of any risk . "
6 Section 2(1) will operate to defeat any attempt to exclude or restrict liability for death or personal injuries caused by negligence .
7 Section 8 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act provides that a clause in a contract which purports to exclude or restrict liability for misrepresentation will only be effective if it satisfies the requirement of reasonableness .
8 Clauses which seek to exclude or restrict liability for misrepresentation are regulated by s3 of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 .
9 ( ii ) Sale and supply of goods.Sections 6 and 7 control clauses which purport to exclude or restrict liability for breach of the statutory implied terms relating to the goods supplied under contracts for the sale and supply of goods .
10 A retailer who supplies goods to consumers can not exclude or restrict liability for breach of the implied terms , but the retailer 's supplier may exclude liability , if the exclusion satisfies the test of reasonableness .
11 Section 16(1) in the unamended form applicable at the relevant time stated : ‘ Where a term of a contract purports to exclude or restrict liability for breach of duty arising in the course of any business or from the occupation of any premises used for business premises of the occupier that term … ( b ) shall … have no effect if it was not fair and reasonable to incorporate the term in the contract . ’
12 ( iii ) Other breaches of contract.Section 3 applies to clauses which exclude or restrict liability for breach of contract .
13 ( b ) Misrepresentation Under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 , clauses which exclude or restrict liability for misrepresentation or which exclude or restrict " any remedy available to another party to the contract by reason of such a misrepresentation " are ineffective unless they satisfy the test of reasonableness .
14 If the seller wishes to restrict or exclude liability for infringement of third party intellectual property rights there are , however , some options open to him .
15 ( i ) Liability for negligence.Clauses or notices which seek to exclude or limit liability for loss or damage caused by negligence are covered by s2 of the Act .
16 The use of certain exclusion clauses is made a criminal offence : the Consumer Transactions ( Restriction on Statements ) Order ( SI 1976 No 1813 ) makes it a criminal offence to seek to exclude or limit liability for breach of the implied terms in contracts of sale where the buyer deals as a consumer a defined in the UCTA 1977 .
17 The UCTA 1977 regulates clauses in any standard terms which : ( a ) exclude or limit liability for breach of the implied terms relating to the goods in contracts for the sale or supply of goods ( ss6 and 7 ) ; ( b ) exclude or limit liability for losses caused by negligence or breach of a duty of care ( s2 ) ; ( c ) exclude or limit liability for other breaches of contract ( s3 ) .
18 It is submitted , therefore , that s3 is capable of applying to clauses which define duties , at least where the clause defines the duties in a way contrary to what a reasonable person would expect in the absence of the term in question , and the drafter should assume that it will apply to all clauses which exclude or limit liability for breach of contract , or allow a party to alter the nature of performance ( see also the attitude of Bridge LJ to clauses seeking to avoid liability for misrepresentation in Cremdean Properties Ltd v Nash ( 1977 ) 244 EG 547 , examined in Chapter 8,2 ) .
19 Thus s2(1) of UCTA 1977 nullifies contractual provisions and notices excluding or restricting liability for negligence resulting in death or injury .
20 Section 7 provides : 7 – ( 1 ) Where the possession or ownership of goods passes under or in pursuance of a contract not governed by the law of sale of goods or hire-purchase , subsections ( 2 ) to ( 4 ) below apply as regards the effect ( if any ) to be given to contract terms excluding or restricting liability for breach of obligation arising by implication of law from the nature of the contract .
21 In the case of Archer-Shee , which is said to have established that such income is income of the beneficiary , it appears to have been conceded by the Revenue that it was not to be so treated as regards liability for Income Tax .
22 One aspect of the contra proferentem rule is that , if there is more than one possible head of liability one of which is liability for negligence , then an exemption clause will not be interpreted as excluding liability for negligence unless it does so in clear terms .
23 ( ii ) Liability for negligence.Decisions of the courts show that there has generally been a reluctance to interpret a clause as excluding liability for negligence , unless clear words are used .
24 In this case , s 3 of the UCTA will regulate a guarantee as excluding liability for breach or failure to perform a contractual obligation .
  Next page