Example sentences of "[conj] [verb] [noun sg] for breach " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | ( ii ) Sale and supply of goods.Sections 6 and 7 control clauses which purport to exclude or restrict liability for breach of the statutory implied terms relating to the goods supplied under contracts for the sale and supply of goods . |
| 2 | A retailer who supplies goods to consumers can not exclude or restrict liability for breach of the implied terms , but the retailer 's supplier may exclude liability , if the exclusion satisfies the test of reasonableness . |
| 3 | Section 16(1) in the unamended form applicable at the relevant time stated : ‘ Where a term of a contract purports to exclude or restrict liability for breach of duty arising in the course of any business or from the occupation of any premises used for business premises of the occupier that term … ( b ) shall … have no effect if it was not fair and reasonable to incorporate the term in the contract . ’ |
| 4 | It is a criminal offence under the Consumer Transactions ( Restriction on Statements ) Order ( SI 1976 No 1813 ) to purport to exclude or restrict liablity for breach of the statutory implied terms relating to goods in ss13-15 of the SGA 1979 where the buyer deals as a consumer within the meaning of that expression in the UCTA 1977 . |
| 5 | 5 The remedies available to the client to enforce performance of those remedies or to obtain redress for breach . |
| 6 | ( iii ) Other breaches of contract.Section 3 applies to clauses which exclude or restrict liability for breach of contract . |
| 7 | The use of certain exclusion clauses is made a criminal offence : the Consumer Transactions ( Restriction on Statements ) Order ( SI 1976 No 1813 ) makes it a criminal offence to seek to exclude or limit liability for breach of the implied terms in contracts of sale where the buyer deals as a consumer a defined in the UCTA 1977 . |
| 8 | The UCTA 1977 regulates clauses in any standard terms which : ( a ) exclude or limit liability for breach of the implied terms relating to the goods in contracts for the sale or supply of goods ( ss6 and 7 ) ; ( b ) exclude or limit liability for losses caused by negligence or breach of a duty of care ( s2 ) ; ( c ) exclude or limit liability for other breaches of contract ( s3 ) . |
| 9 | It is submitted , therefore , that s3 is capable of applying to clauses which define duties , at least where the clause defines the duties in a way contrary to what a reasonable person would expect in the absence of the term in question , and the drafter should assume that it will apply to all clauses which exclude or limit liability for breach of contract , or allow a party to alter the nature of performance ( see also the attitude of Bridge LJ to clauses seeking to avoid liability for misrepresentation in Cremdean Properties Ltd v Nash ( 1977 ) 244 EG 547 , examined in Chapter 8,2 ) . |
| 10 | Section 7 provides : 7 – ( 1 ) Where the possession or ownership of goods passes under or in pursuance of a contract not governed by the law of sale of goods or hire-purchase , subsections ( 2 ) to ( 4 ) below apply as regards the effect ( if any ) to be given to contract terms excluding or restricting liability for breach of obligation arising by implication of law from the nature of the contract . |
| 11 | In this case , s 3 of the UCTA will regulate a guarantee as excluding liability for breach or failure to perform a contractual obligation . |