Example sentences of "[be] hold that this " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | To trigger section 76(2) ( b ) , however , it must be the case that there something was ‘ said or done ’ which was likely to render a confession unreliable , and it has been held that this means something said or done to D , as distinct from some words or conduct of D himself ( Goldenberg ( 1988 ) 88 Cr.App.R. 285 ) . |
| 2 | It is clear that the measure of damages for the conversion of a negotiable instrument is prima facie the face value , not the value as paper but it has been held that this principle is inapplicable to non-negotiable documents such as holiday credit stamps . |
| 3 | If A had an honest doubt whether there was a contract at all between B and C it has been held that this would provide a good defence but if the doubt is whether A 's rights or C's under two inconsistent agreements should prevail and A chooses to adopt a course which on one view of the law will undoubtedly interfere with C 's rights , it has been said that he must at least show that he was advised and honestly believed that he was entitled to take that course . |
| 4 | Some consideration was given to whether the defect in Form N79 could be cured by this court under section 13 of the Act of 1960 or under R.S.C. , Ord. 59 , r. 10(3) , but it was held that this could not be done . |
| 5 | On an appeal to the Court of Appeal [ 1992 ] Ch. 342 it was held that this statement should be produced subject to certain names and passages being omitted . |
| 6 | It was held that this was insufficient information to give an arrestee , and the constable who arrested in those circumstances had gone beyond the scope of his duty since he was exercising his admitted power improperly . |
| 7 | Here it was held that this showed that all reasonable care had been taken . |
| 8 | Although claims in negligence for purely financial loss do not generally succeed , it was held that this claim by the owner against the nominated sub-contractor could succeed in negligence ( i.e. even though there was no contract between the owner and sub-contractor ) . |
| 9 | It was held that this did not entitle the buyers to reject the whole consignment . |
| 10 | It was held that this amounted to recklessness . |
| 11 | It was held that this instruction was inadequate to prevent the commission of the offence ( under section 1 ) . |
| 12 | It was held that this was no defence for the defendants who should have relied upon the defence of ‘ act or default of another person . ’ |
| 13 | It was held that this did not entitle the seller to take from the buyer the proceeds of the sub-sales of his ( the seller 's ) property ; instead it merely created a charge in favour of the seller which was void because it was not registered under the Companies Act . |
| 14 | This was taken one step further in Stadium Finance v. Robbins where it was held that this requirement was not complied with . |
| 15 | It was held that this operated to avoid the contract . |
| 16 | It was held that this could not constitute a " manner of manufacture " ( the phrase used instead of " industrial application " prior to the 1977 Act ) . |
| 17 | It was held that this claim was allowable . |
| 18 | It was held that this loss should be recoverable from the shipowners because they should reasonably have contemplated that the delay would have resulted in a loss . |
| 19 | It was held that this merely incorporated the words of the headlease , and that the continuing existence of the headlease was not a condition precedent to the right to review the rent under the sublease . |
| 20 | It was held that this was a contract for sale and the plaintiffs were therefore able to sue for the price . |