Example sentences of "[verb] [that] you be " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 because you did n't have to worry that you were gon na have another child !
2 I suggest that you are over conscientious . ’
3 Suggest that you be allowed to search some parts of your local parks from the end of September to the end of April once or twice per month ; this should sound reasonable enough to your councillor and , hopefully , your council .
4 When you are up then you must know that you are up !
5 You do n't know that you are inadvertently causing the work to arrive late by stressing its urgency any more than you know what thoughts and feelings are going on inside the typist .
6 Shedding tears is a way of letting other people know that you are in need of comfort .
7 John 13:35 says , ‘ All men will know that you are my disciples if you love one another . ’
8 Firstly , you can know that you are an OK person because you are the most fantastically designed , most wonderfully advanced and most incredibly complicated part of God 's world !
9 The second , for instance , amounts to an assertion that one can not answer the question ‘ How do you know that you are in pain ? ’ by simply saying ‘ Because I am in pain' .
10 You do not know that you are not a brain , suspended in a vat full of liquid in a laboratory , and wired to a computer which is feeding you your current experiences under the control of some ingenious technician/scientist ( benevolent or malevolent according to taste ) .
11 Is it possible , however , that though you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat you still know many other things , perhaps more important ?
12 We can surely conclude that if you know that you are sitting reading , you know that you are not a brain in a vat , and hence ( by simple modus tollens ) that since you do n't know that you are not a brain in a vat ( agreed above ) you do n't know that you are sitting reading .
13 We can surely conclude that if you know that you are sitting reading , you know that you are not a brain in a vat , and hence ( by simple modus tollens ) that since you do n't know that you are not a brain in a vat ( agreed above ) you do n't know that you are sitting reading .
14 It seems therefore to show , more generally , that since you do n't know that you are not a brain in a vat you can not know any proposition p of which you know that if p were true , you would not be a brain in a vat .
15 And there are similar slightly different arguments , for instance Descartes ' version which takes q = you are dreaming and argues that since you do n't know that you are not dreaming you do n't know any proposition p of which you know that if p were true you would not be dreaming ( see the first Meditation in Descartes , 1955 ) .
16 It seems to show that the imaginary case in which you are a brain in a vat being fed the experiences of reading a book is perfectly effective in showing that you do not know that you are reading a book .
17 The conditional theory of knowledge can show that you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat .
18 Therefore , if the conditional theory of knowledge is on the right lines , you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat .
19 Despite this , Nozick 's account can be used to show that you do know that you are currently sitting reading a philosophy book ( please sit down first ) .
20 First , it can reinforce our intuitions that you know that you are sitting reading etc. , that you know that if you are sitting reading etc. you are not a brain in a vat , and that you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat .
21 However , you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat because it is not the case that ( 3 ) in the nearest worlds in which you are a brain in a vat you believe that you are a brain in a vat .
22 Hence you can know that you are sitting reading even though you do not know that you are not asleep in bed , dreaming that you are sitting reading .
23 Hence you can know that you are sitting reading even though you do not know that you are not asleep in bed , dreaming that you are sitting reading .
24 In other words , although you can not absolutely know or control the meanings that your novel communicates to its readers , you can not not know that you are involved in an activity of communication , otherwise you will have no criteria of relevance , logic , cohesion , success and failure , in the composition of your fictional discourse .
25 And does he know that you are using him ? ’
26 Do you know that you are thought to have been imprisoned for debt ? ’
27 Let them know that you are always delighted to have them drop in but that it is the responsibility for having children on their own you find too much .
28 Your reader will then know that you are not presuming that she or he knows what the term means .
29 and Father does he , does he know that you are a catholic ?
30 How do you know that you are a Christian ?
  Next page