Example sentences of "[unc] do it [verb] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | At what point erm did i er did it become an official dispute , how how at the point of becoming an official dispute ? |
| 2 | Were the dog 's tips any good or er did it turn out |
| 3 | Erm and how did that go down well , did it er did it work in practice ? |
| 4 | How , how did it work out on the champion of champions night with having the the table show , the full table show that we cancelled when Danny came er how did it work er did it work out comfortably ? |
| 5 | It does seem to me an extraordinary catalogue of errors erm and one can well understand how errors take p er could , could have occurred during the somewhat co chaotic passage of the Railways Bill er what , what can not be understood and what is quite inexcusable is , is the fact that no steps adequate steps have been taken to correct those errors and to assure the er continued existence of a er Transport Police which er h h has the sole responsibility for er policing large public spaces in , in this country and er as the Noble Lord has made clear , er does it honour er very considerable scale , very effectively er I hope that the Minister will find it possible to make a favourable reply to the arguments which have been raised . |
| 6 | er does it want to be |
| 7 | I mean er does it bother you at all that well I mean are most of the men managers ? |
| 8 | Is there not a question in there , unless I 'm going , er does it ask you er alright you can talk fast something like that |
| 9 | You you have already erm done it going into the greenbelt . |
| 10 | Tt , erm does it mean like how many in a bar ? |
| 11 | but the second way in which section fourteen arises is this slightly more oblique way , erm , it 's , it 's not really the question of competition law it 's more a question of administrative law or constitutional law , erm whether it arises on the question er , your Lordship will have to decide , but , if , if it does then we believe that our case is extremely strong , because what one is saying here is , is section fourteen a block to an article eighty five action , erm does it make it either virtually impossible or something lesser excessively difficult , er and we say er that that 's one aspect and two can we show it 's discriminatory , well we say first of all it is discriminatory because even on analysis of the bad faith argument they are putting in a claimant with an article eighty five case to an extraordinary length in order to make good his case , he first of all has to super declaration presumably that he is entitled to damages , but he ca n't get damages all he 's entitled to is the declaration if then do n't satisfy that claim by paying up and their not going to be ordered by the court to pay up because that 's a claim for damages and you ca n't have that then you have to sue them again on the basis of breach of bad faith , er no other provision in English law would go to that effect and that of course even , even that assumes whether rightly or wrongly and we say possibly wrongly that er , er the failure to comply with the judgment of the declaration would be bad faith within the meaning of the act , but even assuming it 's right it puts a plaintiff suing for breach of article eighty five in the worst position possible |
| 12 | Can we erm does it have to be all on here or can we use ? |
| 13 | Erm does it put you off with Mike there ? |
| 14 | Did y did it happen did when when it happened to you when this happened to you , when you had things stolen from you . |
| 15 | How large were the , were the classes with these influx of all these , di did it boost up the numbers in the ? |
| 16 | W does it matter if I do n't take three a day ? |
| 17 | But d does it need to be uncovered ? |
| 18 | You do n't get taugh do it like that . |