Example sentences of "[noun prp] v. " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 The problem may be illustrated by the county court case of Falconer v. A. S. L. E. F .
2 REGINA V. LIVERPOOL CITY JUSTICES , Ex parte DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
3 [ COURT OF APPEAL ] REGINA v. CHRISTOU REGINA v. WRIGHT ( CHRISTOPHER ) 1992 May 11 , 12 ; 21
4 REGINA v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT , Ex parte FACTORTAME LTD .
5 REGINA v. POPLAR CORONER AND ANOTHER , Ex parte THOMAS
6 REGINA v. CALLENDER
7 REGINA v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT , Ex parte DOODY
8 Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Pegg
9 Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Pierson
10 Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Smart
11 REGINA v. VISITORS TO LINCOLN 'S INN , Ex parte CALDER
12 Regina v. Visitors to Lincoln 's Inn , Ex parte Calder
13 Regina v. Visitors to Lincoln 's Inn , Ex parte Persaud On an application for judicial review made pursuant to leave granted by Rose J. on 17 September 1991 , the applicant in the second case , Norman Persaud , a barrister , sought inter alia , an order of certiorari to quash an order made by the Visitors to Lincoln 's Inn on 31 July 1991 whereby it was held that the applicants ' petition of appeal , dated 28 September 1990 , from the findings and the sentence of the disciplinary tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court be dismissed .
14 On appeal from Regina v. Gomez
15 REGINA v. LORD PRESIDENT OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL , Ex parte PAGE
16 [ On appeal from Regina v. Hull University Visitor , Ex parte Page ]
17 In Allcard v. Skinner ( 1887 ) 36 Ch.D. 145 , 183 Lindley L.J .
18 O'Rourke v. Darbishire [ 1920 ] A.C. 581 , H.L. ( E. )
19 Trust documents , they say , are the property of the beneficiaries of the trust and must be produced by the trustees as a matter of property and not of discovery : O'Rourke v. Darbishire [ 1920 ] A.C. 581 , 626–627 ; In re Londonderry 's Settlement [ 1965 ] Ch. 918 , 933f–g , 934b , 938 .
20 As Lord Wrenbury said in O'Rourke v. Darbishire [ 1920 ] A.C. 581 , 626–627 ( and as Neill L.J .
21 Union Départementale des Syndicats C.G.T . de l'Aisne v. Sidef Conforama ( Case C 312/89 ) , The Times , 6 March 1991 , E.C.J.
22 I shall have to consider the effect of the judgment of the court in that case , and two later cases , Union Départmentale des Syndicats C.G.T . de l'Aisne v. Sidef Conforama ( Case C 312/89 ) and Criminal Proceedings v. A. Marchandise ( Case C 332/89 ) , The Times , 6 March 1991 , at a later stage .
23 The cause célèbre of the period is Roberts v.
24 Laski 's study of judicial review is particularly interesting since its primary focus is a study of Roberts v.
25 Roberts v. J. Hampson & Co. [ 1990 ] 1 W.L.R. 94 ; [ 1989 ] 2 All E.R.
26 In Roberts v. Hopwood Poplar Council had decided to pay their low grade workers £4 per week .
27 The classic case of this was Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ( 1893 C.A. ) where the defendants published an advertisement claiming that their product was a cure and preventative of any number of illnesses .
28 It can be seen then that manufacturers ’ ‘ guarantees ’ ( or ‘ warranties ’ ) often form the basis of a contract between manufacturer and customer similar to that in Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co .
29 353 ; or when a barrister member of the Inn wished to appeal against his expulsion from the Inn and consequent disbarment : Booreman 's Case ( 1642 ) March N.C. 177 ; Manisty v. Kenealy ( 1876 ) 24 W.R. 918 .
30 This international law argument was originally tested in the well-known case of Cheney v.
  Next page