Example sentences of "[noun prp] v. " in BNC.
Next pageNo | Sentence |
---|---|
1 | The problem may be illustrated by the county court case of Falconer v. A. S. L. E. F . |
2 | REGINA V. LIVERPOOL CITY JUSTICES , Ex parte DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS |
3 | [ COURT OF APPEAL ] REGINA v. CHRISTOU REGINA v. WRIGHT ( CHRISTOPHER ) 1992 May 11 , 12 ; 21 |
4 | REGINA v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT , Ex parte FACTORTAME LTD . |
5 | REGINA v. POPLAR CORONER AND ANOTHER , Ex parte THOMAS |
6 | REGINA v. CALLENDER |
7 | REGINA v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT , Ex parte DOODY |
8 | Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Pegg |
9 | Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Pierson |
10 | Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Smart |
11 | REGINA v. VISITORS TO LINCOLN 'S INN , Ex parte CALDER |
12 | Regina v. Visitors to Lincoln 's Inn , Ex parte Calder |
13 | Regina v. Visitors to Lincoln 's Inn , Ex parte Persaud On an application for judicial review made pursuant to leave granted by Rose J. on 17 September 1991 , the applicant in the second case , Norman Persaud , a barrister , sought inter alia , an order of certiorari to quash an order made by the Visitors to Lincoln 's Inn on 31 July 1991 whereby it was held that the applicants ' petition of appeal , dated 28 September 1990 , from the findings and the sentence of the disciplinary tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court be dismissed . |
14 | On appeal from Regina v. Gomez |
15 | REGINA v. LORD PRESIDENT OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL , Ex parte PAGE |
16 | [ On appeal from Regina v. Hull University Visitor , Ex parte Page ] |
17 | In Allcard v. Skinner ( 1887 ) 36 Ch.D. 145 , 183 Lindley L.J . |
18 | O'Rourke v. Darbishire [ 1920 ] A.C. 581 , H.L. ( E. ) |
19 | Trust documents , they say , are the property of the beneficiaries of the trust and must be produced by the trustees as a matter of property and not of discovery : O'Rourke v. Darbishire [ 1920 ] A.C. 581 , 626–627 ; In re Londonderry 's Settlement [ 1965 ] Ch. 918 , 933f–g , 934b , 938 . |
20 | As Lord Wrenbury said in O'Rourke v. Darbishire [ 1920 ] A.C. 581 , 626–627 ( and as Neill L.J . |
21 | Union Départementale des Syndicats C.G.T . de l'Aisne v. Sidef Conforama ( Case C 312/89 ) , The Times , 6 March 1991 , E.C.J. |
22 | I shall have to consider the effect of the judgment of the court in that case , and two later cases , Union Départmentale des Syndicats C.G.T . de l'Aisne v. Sidef Conforama ( Case C 312/89 ) and Criminal Proceedings v. A. Marchandise ( Case C 332/89 ) , The Times , 6 March 1991 , at a later stage . |
23 | The cause célèbre of the period is Roberts v. |
24 | Laski 's study of judicial review is particularly interesting since its primary focus is a study of Roberts v. |
25 | Roberts v. J. Hampson & Co. [ 1990 ] 1 W.L.R. 94 ; [ 1989 ] 2 All E.R. |
26 | In Roberts v. Hopwood Poplar Council had decided to pay their low grade workers £4 per week . |
27 | The classic case of this was Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ( 1893 C.A. ) where the defendants published an advertisement claiming that their product was a cure and preventative of any number of illnesses . |
28 | It can be seen then that manufacturers ’ ‘ guarantees ’ ( or ‘ warranties ’ ) often form the basis of a contract between manufacturer and customer similar to that in Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co . |
29 | 353 ; or when a barrister member of the Inn wished to appeal against his expulsion from the Inn and consequent disbarment : Booreman 's Case ( 1642 ) March N.C. 177 ; Manisty v. Kenealy ( 1876 ) 24 W.R. 918 . |
30 | This international law argument was originally tested in the well-known case of Cheney v. |