Example sentences of "it be hold that the [noun pl] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 it was held that the circumstances were such that the conclusion had to be that the passenger was ‘ a person using the vehicle ’ for the purpose of clause 6(1) ( c ) of the mib agreement of 1972 and was not therefore entitled to compensation from the bureau .
2 It was held that the goods must correspond not only with the sample but must also be ‘ foreign refined rape oil . ’
3 It was held that the employers were in breach of their personal duty of care , as they should have told the plaintiff to test the sashes to see if they were loose and provided him with wedges .
4 It was held that the regulations did not give rise to an action for damages .
5 In Howard E. Perry & Co . Ltd. v. B.R.B. it was held that the defendants ' refusal to allow the plaintiffs to enter their premises to collect goods which belonged to them could not be justified by their fear of intensified industrial action .
6 It was held that the defendants were guilty of wilfully promoting racial hatred if they foresaw that hatred was a certain or morally certain consequence of what they were doing , even though it was not their purpose to promote hatred .
7 It was held that the defendants had no defence under section 24 because they had , in failing to display a disclaimer , failed to take all reasonable precautions .
8 It was held that the defendants owed a duty of care as designers and builders of the flat and were liable under that head .
9 It was held that the defendants , who had acquired the information in the knowledge that the supply was a breach by that subscriber of his contract with the plaintiff , could be restrained by injunction from surreptitiously obtaining or copying information collected by the plaintiffs .
10 In Geo Mitchell ( Chesterhall ) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd [ 1983 ] 2 AC 803 it was held that the defendants ' limitation of liability was unreasonable and therefore unenforceable under the Act ; a decisive factor was that in previous cases the defendants had settled claims without seeking to rely on the limitation clause , impliedly recognising that it was not reasonable .
11 It was held that the defendants were liable because they ought to have foreseen the possibility of the chemical coming into contact with water and they had not warned the buyers of this danger .
12 ( No. 2 ) , the facts of which have already been summarised , and in which it was held that the restrictions imposed on the bringing of a direct civil action for breach of a statute could not be outflanked by framing the claim as one for the tort of unlawful interference with trade .
13 It was held that the facts did not show any detinue and it was also said that C had done no wrong by not allowing A to enter and remove them .
14 It was held that the plaintiffs could succeed against the first defendants in contract , but in third party proceedings the first defendant 's action against the second defendants ( the manufacturers of the pails ) failed as the pails were merchantable under s14(2) .
15 It was held that the brothers " were the architects of an arrangement within the definition of s437 " ( now TA 1988 , s663 ) ( Vinelott J at p685 ) thus , when dividends were paid on the shares to the children that was income arising from a transaction which had the necessary element of bounty and the income was taxed upon the settlor ( as the children were minors ) .
16 It was held that the terms which were ultimately agreed could apply , retrospectively , to work which had already been done .
17 In a New Zealand decision , it was held that the police are in a different position , so that the associate of the police ‘ victim ’ was guilty of assaulting the police in the execution of their duty , even though , viz-à-viz the victim they were acting outside the execution of their duty .
18 It was held that the words , ‘ like proceedings shall be had ’ , should be construed to give any person aggrieved the right to apply by way of information and summons for the penal orders available under s.94 of the 1936 Act .
19 It was held that the words used were incapable of being insulting ( even though they were rude and offensive ) , and the Court left open the question currently under discussion .
20 It was held that the arrangements constituted a settlement of which the taxpayer was a settlor , that he had provided income for the purposes of the settlement and the income was assessable on him under what is now TA 1988 , s663 .
21 It was held that the applicants lacked a sufficient interest in the matter because the Revenue had acted within the discretion permitted to it in the day-to-day administration of the tax system .
22 Regina v. Visitors to Lincoln 's Inn , Ex parte Persaud On an application for judicial review made pursuant to leave granted by Rose J. on 17 September 1991 , the applicant in the second case , Norman Persaud , a barrister , sought inter alia , an order of certiorari to quash an order made by the Visitors to Lincoln 's Inn on 31 July 1991 whereby it was held that the applicants ' petition of appeal , dated 28 September 1990 , from the findings and the sentence of the disciplinary tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court be dismissed .
23 It was held that the repayments were capital sums and the settlor was correctly assessed to surtax .
24 It was held that the sellers were in breach both of the condition that they had the right to sell the goods and also of the warranty of quiet possession .
25 As a result it was held that the sellers ' right to repossess the goods did not arise until the expiry of the credit period allowed by the terms .
26 Thus in Cammell Laird and Co Ltd v Manganese Bronze and Brass Co Ltd [ 1934 ] AC 402 , the contract was for the provision of two propellers for a specified ship and it was held that the sellers knew the purpose for which the propellers were required , ie that they should be suitable for the ship in question .
  Next page