Example sentences of "he go on [prep] [adj] [noun] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | Let's hope he goes on to greater things . |
| 2 | He goes on with self-glorifying statements like , ‘ I made my first tube amplifier in 1957 ’ . |
| 3 | He goes on at some length referring to the machinery used for scribbling , spinning , fulling etc , all of these processes carried out under one roof . |
| 4 | He went on at great length on this subject , banging his pastoral staff on the floor and haranguing the assembly until the pope cried ‘ Enough ’ , and the reading of the decrees was resumed . |
| 5 | He went on at some length about the idiocy of the strategic bombing of Germany and how the Red Army had won the war in Europe . |
| 6 | He went on at some length , complete with the appropriate gestures and noises , on his experiences as a car jockey in a parking garage : other people 's cars were part of his early training as a driver and , like every Italian kid his age , he had had a burning admiration for grand prix racing and the great heroes of his day , especially Alberto Ascari . |
| 7 | He went on at some length , with a slightly exaggerated middle-class accent , to enthuse over the pleasures of privileged country living . |
| 8 | He went on about various things but I only half heard him . |
| 9 | I drifted off into non-league and he went on to big things at West Ham . |
| 10 | ‘ She and the other girl were obviously in league , ’ he went on with savage certainty . |
| 11 | But he was in a cheerful mood and he went on with another story altogether . |
| 12 | Aware of the complete control he had over them , and enjoying it , he went on with more deliberation . |
| 13 | Unabashed , he went on in later years to inveigh against pornography and violence in the cinema . |
| 14 | How should he get through his work if he went on in this way ? |
| 15 | Supposing that the essential words conferring the primacy on all successive archbishops of Canterbury were in fact in the letters which Lanfranc mentioned , why did he go on at such length about the facts drawn from Bede , when a single quotation from one of the passages granting the primacy in perpetuity to the archbishops of Canterbury would have been worth all the rest of his argument put together ? |