Example sentences of "be [pron] [vb pp] [to-vb] [adj] [noun] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | ‘ Well , are you prepared to take this man on ? ’ |
| 2 | Are you allowed to use bulletproof jackets . |
| 3 | Are you allowed to use bulletproof jackets , yes . |
| 4 | While the onus is on the defence , most police officers ’ statements contain the question ‘ Are you insured to drive this motor vehicle ? ’ |
| 5 | I say , are we allowed to do manual labour ? |
| 6 | WHY ARE WE ENCOURAGED TO EAT MORE FIBRE ? |
| 7 | Who has enough food to exchange goods for a piece of baked earth or strands of the seed of cotton , and why are they inclined to buy handmade objects at all when manufactured goods look safer , may be guaranteed , and will almost always be cheaper ? |
| 8 | There ought to be some news , but were you allowed to put ordinary news in love letters , or only love , all on its own ? |
| 9 | Were you allowed to keep that money ? |
| 10 | The question of whether society has a right to take a life for a life is one guaranteed to raise heated debate . |
| 11 | The question of whether society has a right to take a life for a life is one guaranteed to raise heated debate . |
| 12 | Is it designed to avoid some activity or person ? |
| 13 | I do n't know if anybody wants to make any comments about any of the items on paper B Okay , is it agreed to receive this report ? |
| 14 | Is he prepared to sanction such manipulation of waiting lists ? |
| 15 | Mr X will argue that he has not received and nor is he entitled to receive any capital sum , namely a loan or a repayment of a loan . |
| 16 | The requirement effect on trade which member states of jurisdiction requirement , it is jurisdictionable because it is the first task that the commissioner of the court should undertake when considering quote from wind surfing get in constant and the concept and agreement which may effect trade is intended to define in the law governing cartels the boundary between the areas , respectively covered by community law and national law , it is not necessary law for the competition effected by the alleged restriction and the trade which is effected between members of states to be the same , an example in the defendants list of authorities it 's in the principal and in that case the restriction of competition arose in relation to a product possible spirits which was itself used to manufacture other products namely cognac , it was argued that the that since there was no trade between members of state and possible spirits there could be no effect upon trade between member of states and so twenty five could not apply , the court accepted that factual premise , there is no trade between member of state and import of spirits , but rejected the legal conclusion , they concluded that is was necessary for there to be an effect upon trade in the market where the restrictions occurred , they was trading another product which was related to possible spirits , and of course stated , it must be observed in that respect that any agreement who 's object to effect is to a strict competition by fixing minimum prices for an intermediate product is capable of effecting intro community trade , even if there is no trading in that intermediate product between members of state , that the product constitutes the raw material of another project marketing elsewhere |