Example sentences of "article [no cls] of [art] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Indeed , by the terms of Article 109J(i) of the Treaty of Maastricht ( to which Britain 's opt-out does not apply ) they were bound to do so .
2 In respect of UK membership of the EC it should be recalled that Article 3(f) of the Treaty of Rome provides for ‘ the institution of a system ensuring that competition in the common market is not distorted ’ .
3 Article 85(1) of the EC treaty prohibits undertakings between firms and restrictive practices which may affect trade between member states , or which have as their object or effect the restriction of competition within the EC .
4 The Dutch court , acting under Article 15(2) of the Hague Convention which the Netherlands Government had declared applicable , issued a default judgment .
5 Admittedly , the Brugnoni case is concerned with article 2(1) of the First Directive , which provided for the grant of general authorisations in respect of the capital movements set out in list B of Annex I , and Directive ( 85/566/E.E.C. ) repealed that article and merged list B with list A referred to in article 1(1) , under which member states are to grant all foreign exchange authorisations required .
6 Article 2(1) of the Order reads :
7 In particular , they referred in that connection to the infringement of the rights conferred on the ‘ joint venture ’ vessels by article 168(4) of the Act of Accession 1985 , read in conjunction with Annex XII thereto .
8 In support of a recent complaint it had made to the EC Commission , Tretorn cites Article 85(1) ( d ) and Article 86(c) of the Treaty of Rome , which refers to ‘ dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties , thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage .
9 Since the external frontiers of a Schengen state may be with another Community state , this poses a possible conflict with Article 8A of the EEC Treaty requiring the Community to be an area without internal frontiers .
10 When the Single European Act first came into force , they took exception to a number of Commission proposals put forward as single market measures under Article 100A of the EEC Treaty , and thus capable of being adopted by qualified majority in the Council .
11 The submission however ignores article 3(2) of the Treaty .
12 Ireland , for its part , argued that the requirements at issue were justified under article 56(1) of the E.E.C .
13 Article 10(1) of the European Convention sets out the basic principle which the makers of common and statute law in Britain have never quite mustered the courage to adopt : " Everyone has the right to freedom of expression .
14 The second was that Article 3(1) of the Directive' the transferor 's rights and obligations arising from a contract of employment or from an employment relationship existing on the date of a transfer within the meaning of Article 1(1) shall , by reason of such transfer , be transferred to the transferee' did not require an employee who was opposed to the transfer to have his contract transferred with the business .
15 So article 7(5) of the Leasing Convention , which provides that nothing in article 7 is to affect the priority of any lien creditor , does not mean that lien creditors are to have priority over the lessor , merely that article 7 itself is not to be treated as dealing with the issue , so that resort must be had to the applicable law .
16 Article 7(5) of the High Court and County Courts Jurisdiction Order 1991 sets out the criteria to be considered when deciding whether or not to make an order for transfer in a case in which both the High Court and the County Court have mutual jurisdiction .
17 is in the service of a visiting force or headquarters ( as defined in Article 8(6) of the Visiting Forces and International Headquarters ( Application of Law ) Order 1965 ) ;
18 This in fact repeats more generally what was stated with regard to environmental competence by Article 130R(4) of the EEC Treaty , inserted by the Single European Act , under which ‘ the Community shall take action relating to the environment to the extent to which the objectives … can be attained better at Community level than at the level of the individual Member States ’ , a provision which does not yet appear to have been the object of scrutiny by the European Court of Justice .
19 Sub-Committee C has also queried the excessive reliance by the Commission of the new powers given by Article 118A of the EEC Treaty , introduced by the Single European Act to allow legislation on health and safety matters .
20 This line of case law would appear to be challenged by the wording of Article 100A(4) of the EEC Treaty , introduced by the Single European Act .
21 No District Court accepted the exclusivity argument , many relying on a superficial reading of Article 27(c) of the Convention , which allows Contracting States to permit ‘ by internal law or practice , methods of taking evidence other than those provided for in this Convention ’ ; the better view is that this freedom is given only to the requested country and does not refer to the country from which the discovery request originates .
22 It followed from article 38(2) of the E.E.C .
23 The Spanish Government considered that obligation to be a particular expression of the obligation imposed on member states under article 40(3) of the E.E.C .
24 As for article 40(3) of the E.E.C .
25 In the Commission 's view , the residence requirement for shareholders was also contrary to article 1(1) of the First Directive of 11 May 1960 for the implementation of article 67 of the E.E.C .
26 Member states were bound by article 1(1) of the Directive to ‘ grant all foreign exchange authorisations required for the conclusion or performance of transactions or for transfers between residents of member states in respect of ’ such capital movements .
27 The United Kingdom referred in that connection to article 5(1) of the Geneva Convention on the High Seas 1958 ( United Nations Treaty Series 450 , No. 6465 ) ( Cmnd. 1929 ) which reads :
28 In support of their view , Belgium and Greece also referred to article 5(1) of the Convention of 1958 and to the Convention of 1982 .
29 The fact that article 5(1) of the Convention of 1958 used the word ‘ nationality ’ did not call that view into question , since the flag flown by ships and the nationality of natural persons were not interchangeable concepts for all purposes .
30 As for the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea , signed at Montego Bay on 10 December 1982 ( Cmnd. 8941 ) , of which the Community is a signatory but which has not yet entered into force , it contains provisions similar to article 5(1) of the Geneva Convention of 1958 ( see articles 91 and 94 ) .
  Next page