Example sentences of "with [art] [noun] plan " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 He soon started to gather illustrations for The Tourist 's New Guide to the Lake District , but as with the Manchester plan , it took much longer than he had hoped , and the final version was not published until 1819 .
2 Perhaps the time has come when we should humbly admit our limitations and seek solutions in co-operation with the Master Plan .
3 In it reconnaissance leads on to strategy and related tactics ; there is management of logistics and intelligence , of time as well as of forces ; planning is constantly updated by observation and reporting ; field actions have their own integrity , but are kept in tune with the master plan .
4 We do not believe the guidance in MPG6 paragraph 71 that minerals applications should simply ‘ have regard to ’ the development plan reflects that contained in PPG12 ; namely that ‘ development must accord with the development plan unless material considerations dictate otherwise ’ .
5 We do not believe the guidance in MPG6 paragraph 71 that minerals applications should simply ‘ have regard to ’ the development plan reflects that contained in PPG12 ; namely that ‘ development must accord with the development plan unless material considerations dictate otherwise ’ .
6 Thus new all new developments must conform with the development plan which must ‘ work towards ensuring that development and growth are sustainable ’ .
7 No because section fifty four A and all section fifty four A says is that a decision should be made on a planning application , in accordance with the development plan .
8 Scientists at the Met Office are prepared to go along with the US plan .
9 This would last about 2–3 weeks , during which time I asked the family to make great efforts with the treatment plan .
10 Within ten minutes , Woodrow Wilson had consulted with his chiefs of staff in the war room , and decided to go ahead with the contingency plan .
11 The crisis of 1965 was a continuation of the argument that had begun in 1961 with the Fouchet Plan and that had resurfaced over the application by Britain to join the EEC .
12 Anything like that always does , even though it 's in line with the Structure Plan and the District Council 's in favour .
13 Lothian Regional Council commented on the previous application ( No. 396/90 ) , which was originally for 56 houses , and advised that the proposal was consistent with the Structure Plan .
14 Local Plans prepared by the District Councils require to be consistent with the Structure Plan and provide the means of implementing the Structure Plan through policies and proposals for specific sites and areas .
15 Local Plans , prepared by the District Councils require to be consistent with the Structure Plan and provide the means of implementing the Structure Plan through policies and proposals for specific sites and areas .
16 This plan , together with the Structure Plan will provide the development plan framework .
17 With regard to strategic planning , the document acknowledges the need to continue with the Structure Plan system and suggests some options as to how this may be achieved .
18 The other concern in the City Council 's evidence on H One er is this issue of distribution , I note Mr Davis 's comments about the difficulties of subdividing the Greater York allocation between different districts , and I I do acknowledge the difficulty in relation to Harrogate , and particularly Hambledon which obviously has a very small proportion of Greater York , on the other hand both Ryedale and Selby do contain a substantial proportion of the Greater York population , er based on my calculations of their er proportion of the population of Greater York which admittedly is a somewhat crude way of of doing estimates , but in the absence of of any other projections that was really the only way to do it , my estimate is that the er compared with the nine seven target of County Council would take in the could potentially be seen to be taking a share of four thousand two hundred in Ryedale and seventeen hundred for Selby , if you base it on their existing population distribution on er part outside the city , now I 'm not saying necessarily that 's how the way you would do it , but I I think it 's an indication that the scale of development in those two districts is quite significant in Greater York , our concern is that the policy as it currently stands does not give any real guidance as to the way in which distribution of development outside the city , but in Greater York , erm can be er should be di divided up , and I think the problem really occurs from the introduction of the new settlement into H One , erm I do n't want to stray into the H Two debate Chair , but I think it 's the fact that H One does include a figure for the new settlement , that the new settlement is not located within any particular district , but that all the district totals do include in effect a figure which is undetermined at this stage , that that would be absorbed by the new settlement , as I understand the policy at the moment , and I think that really does introduce a problem , erm because clearly all of the emerging districts wide local plans could be in conformity with the structure plan and not include the new settlement , I think it 's er interesting to note that the the D O E's recently published a good practice guide , on development plans , did particularly highlight the situation in Greater York , as a problem , as a shortcoming of the existing plan , and if I can just quote it , it does say this , on page forty three , it would seem appropriate for broad locations of new development to be established by means of an alteration to the structure plan .
19 I do n't intend to discuss the housing , whether seven hundred acres , sorry seven l land for seven hundred houses is owned by the City of York , that 's not part of our case one way or the other , but we have offered you a distribution of the Greater York provision figure between the districts , because from Barton Willmore 's very extensive experience of participation in local plan work up and down the country , I think we share the view that er City of York have , that Ryedale have , my colleagues to the left and right on this side of the table have , that there does need to be a distribution , otherwise there will be at best confusion as to whether local plans comply with the structure plan , and at worst a game of of pass the parcel and everybody will be conforming , but nobody will actually be possibly meeting the figures , and that is the situation that I do n't think anybody would wish to see as a result of er the outcome of of alteration number three , I mean I do n't know how the County Council would would really be able to say whether they thought a local plan conformed to the structure plan , without knowing what that distribution was , perhaps in some bottom draw manner which is not now the approved way of going about these things , so that I think there does need to be a distribution for the proper planning of York , and before coming on to our to explain our figures a little bit , I should also say , perhaps in in response to remarks Mr Thomas made earlier on about the general character of the York area and the need to protect that , that that course is precisely what the greenbelt is for , and what it does , it is n't necessary to extend that concept across the whole of the vale of York , and therefore to seek to er discount migration outside the greenbelt .
20 When we are dealing with the structure plan for which there is no local plan in force , we have a new problem which is that , owing to the diagrammatic nature of the plans , no one will be able to say with certainty that this does or does not affect the claimant 's property , but that nevertheless , because of that very uncertainty , a wider number of properties may be affected .
21 Chairman , if , if I may and it is just basically to look at the recommendation and wonder you know perhaps if we 've got it the right way round er that 's all , where we 're saying er there are certain things still outstanding wh which we would need to re-relate before er issuing er general conformity notices I understand b but we 're almost taking that they 're going to do that without any doubt , now I do n't know maybe there are things not said in this report which are well understood , but and members of are quite happy to accept erm er s some more more changes to , to the local plan so that it does conform with with the structure plan , but I just wondered whether round the wrong way .
22 Yes Chairman i it relates to the the body of the policies in the structure plan and if Aida 's plan generally conforms then we must er issue a statement of general conformity er however if there is a , a problem that we 've had for example about the wording of the reference to the erm East Worthing access road , then although that it 's quite proper for this committee to be concerned about that wording and ultimately possibly even to object to the plan on the basis of the wording , it does n't affect the extent to which the plan conforms or does n't conform with the structure plan overall .
23 Can I perhaps offer to give give Mr a bit more thinking time and suggest that a local plan which did not contain something which was in the structure plan , as a proposal would not be in accord with the structure plan .
24 If , however , you simply have a designation which says , This is E two land this is in conformity with the structure plan which , incidentally , has n't been proved in my view in relation to development pressure nor landscape quality , nevertheless you just say this is E two land , then it seems to me that it 's very difficult to argue that it is open countryside .
25 Could well be negated because all we 're saying is that the counter argument to it is we 're simply conforming with the structure plan .
26 We 've got to consider the situation of some form of flexibility and it presupposes that if you have a policy in which the settlements are drawn and I suppose I I think they will be tightly drawn , development yes is allocated in accordance with the structure plan .
27 The discussions between the County Council and the District Council go back some considerable time , over the proposed level of provision in the district statement erm the core strategy for employment , and there is a particular issue between us over the distribution of this land within the district , in terms of its compatibility with the structure plan strategy .
28 On the official level , the PLO is still insisting that ‘ it is ready to accept to deal with the Baker plan ’ but only if the composition of the Palestinian delegation is publicly selected by the PLO .
29 On the official level , the PLO is still insisting that ‘ it is ready to accept to deal with the Baker plan ’ but only if the composition of the Palestinian delegation is publicly selected by the PLO .
30 The effort began in July 1985 , with the Austral Plan .
  Next page