Example sentences of "court have [art] [noun] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 The court has no concern with the manner in which Parliament or its officers carrying out its Standing Orders perform these functions .
2 Where there is a judgment for personal injuries ( or death ) which exceeds £200 the court has no discretion but must give interest under ( a ) above unless the court is satisfied that there are special reasons to the contrary ( see Jefford v Gee [ 1970 ] All ER 1202 and Birkett v Hayes [ 1982 ] 2 All ER 710 ) .
3 Mr Scrivener said : ‘ This court has no power to order repayment of ultra vires expenditure , ’ and he commented on the presence of bank representatives , saying : ‘ I have difficulty with them being here . ’
4 For present purposes it does not matter whether the court has no power to order specific treatment to be given contrary to the doctors ' will or has power but will in practice not exercise it in such circumstances .
5 In my opinion , if the defendant 's non est factum case is rejected , the court has no power under section 82(1) to order rectification as against the building society .
6 If the visitor has such jurisdiction , the court has no power to ignore it or review it by way of mandamus or in any other way .
7 ‘ It has been decided , and is now admitted , that where a visitor has acted in his visitatorial capacity , this court has no power to compel him to correct or alter his decision , although that decision may be erroneous .
8 But the Court has no power to impose penalties unless the agreement is a renewing of an agreement that has previously been judged illegal .
9 The court has no power to award further costs .
10 It was emphasised in Fookes v Slaytor [ 1978 ] 1 WLR 1293 that the court has no power to make a finding of contributory negligence if it is not pleaded .
11 The court has no power to order a medical or psychiatric examination of a parent no matter how relevant this may be to the proceedings .
12 The court has no jurisdiction if the complaint concerns breach of the broad duty in section 25 ; the complaint must be made to the Secretary of State under sections 68 and 99 of the Education Act 1944 .
13 On an application for any interim relief under subsection ( 1 ) the court may refuse to grant that relief if , in the opinion of the court , the fact that the court has no jurisdiction apart from this section in relation to the subject-matter of the proceedings in question makes it inexpedient for the court to grant it .
14 In the present summonses Glasgow seeks declarations that the court has no jurisdiction over it in respect of these claims , and asks the court to order that the actions be dismissed .
15 This conclusion is , I think , reinforced by the de Bloos [ 1976 ] E.C.R. 1497 and Union Transport [ 1992 ] 1 W.L.R. 15 cases , showing that the word ‘ obligation ’ in article 5(1) refers to the contractual obligation forming the basis of the legal proceedings ; and also by the interpretation by the Court of Appeal of the Effer case [ 1982 ] E.C.R. 825 in the Tesam case [ 1990 ] I.L.Pr. 149 , showing that where there is no evidence of the existence of a contract , and therefore no real dispute as to its existence , the court has no jurisdiction under article 5(1) .
16 For all these reasons , therefore , we would hold that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain an application for judicial review in either of the cases which are before it .
17 This case seems to me clear authority that the court has no jurisdiction to review the decision of a visitor made within his jurisdiction .
18 The court has no jurisdiction either to say that he erred in his application of the general law ( since the general law is not applicable to the decision ) or to reach a contrary view as to the effect of the domestic law ( since the visitor is the sole judge of such domestic law ) .
19 The court has no jurisdiction to order that a charge registered out of time has priority to a charge which has already been registered .
20 ( c ) Options The court has no jurisdiction to order a new tenancy to contain an option entitling the tenant to purchase the landlord 's reversion ( Kirkwood v Johnson ( 1979 ) 38 P & CR 392 ) .
21 Indeed if a question of law falls within the area of the dispute referred to the expert , it seems that the court has no jurisdiction to consider that question of law , in the absence of specific ad hoc agreement by the parties ( Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v P & O Property Holdings [ 1993 ] 13 EG 108 , CA ) .
22 If the determination is to be by an expert , the court has no jurisdiction to consider questions of law arising out of the matters referred to the expert .
23 Nevertheless , it has been held that the initial approval of the company is required to the proposed scheme and that the court has no jurisdiction to sanction a scheme without that approval , which may be given either by the board of directors or by the company by an ordinary resolution in general meeting ( Re Savoy Hotel Limited [ 1981 ] 3 All ER 646 ) .
24 Each Inn of Court has a Pupillage Committee which manages to fix up all suitable applicants in suitable places eventually .
25 So fine is the distinction that in truth the High Court has a choice before it whether to interfere with an inferior court on a point of law .
26 The court has a discretion , and a record holder who would prefer not to hand over the file is entitled to refuse unless the party gets a court order to disclose .
27 However , in practice it appears that the court has a discretion to allow the case to continue as if begun under Ord. 53 provided this will not unfairly deprive the respondent of some protection which would have been enjoyed if the case had been begun under Ord. 53 .
28 On the contrary , I read them as dismantling an old Crown privilege and substituting for it a principle upon which , in certain limited circumstances , the court has a discretion whether or not to require an undertaking in damages from the Crown as law enforcer .
29 In that case the court has a discretion ( in order to avoid injustice ) to award damages at the higher level of £750 ( i.e. by reference to the market price at July 15 instead of the later contract delivery date of December 1 ) , Johnson v. Agnew ( 1979 H.L. ) .
30 The court has a discretion under s33 to override the s11 or s12 limitation periods if it would be equitable to allow an action to proceed having regard to the prejudice to the plaintiff of applying the s11 or s12 periods against the prejudice to the defendant of not doing so .
  Next page