Example sentences of "see [noun prp] [noun] v " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | Once accepted by the employee he will be discharged forthwith from any contractual duties including compliance with the restraint of trade clause ( see General Billposting v Atkinson [ 1909 ] AC 118 ) . |
| 2 | In deciding this it is not necessary to consider whether members of the public who are knowledgeable about the product are deceived , it may be sufficient if members of the public who have very little knowledge of the product concerned are likely to be deceived , see J. Bollinger v Costa Bravo Wine Co . |
| 3 | If the clause provides for the substitution of figures , it is important to ensure that all necessary mathematical information is given to enable the rent to be calculated ( see Wyndham Investments v Motorway Tyres and Accessories [ 1991 ] 2 EGLR 114 for a case where this was not done , and the index linked rent failed completely ) . |
| 4 | However , a certifier is liable only to his client the employer and not to the contractor : see Pacific Associates v Baxter [ 1990 ] QB 993 . |
| 5 | This ensures that tax at the basic rate is not charged again on such income which has already borne tax at the basic rate ( see Lord Chetwode v IRC ( 1977 ) 51 TC 647 per Sir John Pennycuick at 670H ) . |
| 6 | However , the drafter should remember that problems frequently arise where one party to a contract seeks to escape from it on the grounds that the other is in breach of a condition , and that the time for performance of obligations ( other than payment of money ) under a commercial contract is normally " of the essence " : a failure to perform on time in accordance with the contract will therefore justify the other party in terminating the contract ( see Bunge Corpn v Tradax Export SA [ 1981 ] 1 WLR 711 ) . |
| 7 | For professional negligence generally , see Professional Negligence by Jackson and Powell ( Sweet and Maxwell , London 1987 ) , and for some unsuccessful attempts to sue experts , see Belvedere Motors v King [ 1981 ] EGD 850 and Wallshire Ltd v Aarons [ 1989 ] 1 EGLR 147 ( surveyors ) and Whiteoak v Walker ( 1988 ) 4 BCC 122 ( auditor ) . |
| 8 | The Revenue may argue that the payments are part of the capital cost to Newco of acquiring the business ( see James Snook v Blasdale [ 1952 ] 33 TC 244 ) . |
| 9 | While the existence of a counterclaim does not support a mortgagor 's contention that he would be able to pay within a reasonable time : Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor ( 1987 ) 3 All ER 241 , if the counterclaim is directed to the validity of the mortgage deed , that is a different matter , see Barclays Bank v Waterson ( 1988 ) 1989 CLY 2505 . |