Example sentences of "see [adv] [noun prp] v " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | 6 The question of detriment It has been suggested in some cases ( see eg Coco v Clark ( AN ) ( Engineers ) Ltd [ 1969 ] RPC 41 ) that an obligation of confidence will not be enforced unless the disclosure or use of the information results in a detriment to the plaintiff or an advantage to his competitors . |
| 2 | Similar reasoning has been applied in other cases ( see eg Mendelssohn v Normand Ltd [ 1970 ] 1 QB 177 ; Jaques v Lloyd D George and Ptnrs [ 1968 ] 1 WLR 625 ) . |
| 3 | Thus in Aldridge v Johnson ( 1857 ) 7 E & B 885 there was an agreement to transfer 32 bullocks valued at £192 in return for 100 quarters of barley valued at £125 , the set off of £23 to be paid in cash ; this was construed as a reciprocal sale ( see also Forsyth v Jervis ( 1816 ) 1 Stark 437 ; Sheldon v Cox ( 1824 ) 3 B & C 420 ) . |
| 4 | See also Bull v Pitney-Bowes Ltd [ 1967 ] 1 WLR 273 . |
| 5 | In Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [ 1988 ] 1 All ER 348 the initial contact between the parties was by telephone , but it was held that there was no concluded contract at that stage ( see also Saphir v Zissimos [ 1960 ] 1 Lloyd 's Rep 490 ) . |
| 6 | See also Jenkins v Reid [ 1948 ] 1 All ER 471 . |
| 7 | However , as was pointed out by the Court of Appeal in Coward v Comex Houlder Diving Ltd ( 1988 ) ( reported in Kemp & Kemp , Section M , para27-322 ) the conventional percentage does not necessarily apply where the wife had been earning a considerable sum herself prior to her husband 's death or presumably where she had a substantial private income : see also Davies v Hawes ( 1990 ) reported in Kemp & Kemp , Section M , para27-323 . |
| 8 | See also Gunton v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [ 1981 ] Ch 448 , especially the judgment of Brightman LJ . |
| 9 | It is extremely important that the trustees consider their discretions otherwise these may simply be set aside as the deeds of appointment were in the case of Turner v Turner [ 1983 ] 2 All ER 745 where the trustees simply did what the settlor stated without independently exercising their discretions ( see also Wilson v Turner ( 1883 ) 22 ChD 521 ) . |
| 10 | See e.g. McKew v Holland Hannen & Cubbitts . |
| 11 | ( See e.g. Condon v Basi [ 1985 ] 2 All ER 453 where a standard of reasonable care was applied to participants in a football match . ) |
| 12 | This clause relies upon the ticket cases discussed above , ( see particularly Parker v South Eastern Railway , ante ) If such clauses are to stand it is vital that attention be drawn to them on the face of the order , and wording for this purpose is also provided at the commencement of Precedent 2 . |
| 13 | However , in the case of Lord Inchrya the payments to the beneficiary were of a periodical nature and although made out of capital ( see however Stevenson v Wishart 59 TC 740 ) were payments of income and must be taxed as such . |