Example sentences of "[vb mod] be [verb] [prep] the [noun pl] " in BNC.
Previous page Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 31 | It was suggested that every effort should be made by the Centres to comply with the form required in order to establish the Centres as the major selling agency in Scotland . |
| 32 | I agree that the appeal should be allowed and that declarations should be made in the terms appearing at the end of the judgment of Glidewell L.J . |
| 33 | Perhaps not surprisingly , the ‘ new ’ criminologists insisted that attention should be redirected to the definers of crime . |
| 34 | But the Approved Code makes clear that the level of detail in the risk assessment and therefore the effort required , should be determined by the risks . |
| 35 | We all know of course , writes Stan Thomas that solid timber table-tops should be fixed to the rails by means of ‘ buttons ’ or shrinkage plates , to allow for shrinkage . |
| 36 | Wall battens are usually 38×119mm , or 50×25mm in cross-section , and should be fixed to the walls either with masonry nails or with non-rusting screws driven into wallplugs . |
| 37 | In a study based on a sample of male white-collar workers in firms employing over 500 people A. Stewart , K. Prandy and R.M. Blackburn argue that individual workers in the stratification system should be distinguished from the positions that they occupy . |
| 38 | On that date a submission was made on behalf of the respondent to Judge Holden that the proceedings should be stayed on the grounds of delay and the ‘ resultant prejudice to the defendant . ’ |
| 39 | Government intervention in a market economy should be assessed against the criteria of distributional equity and allocative efficiency . |
| 40 | Powers should be given to the courts to sentence adult offenders to attendance centres . |
| 41 | Close consideration should be given to the monopolies and mergers legislation governing both the UK and the EC ( see Chapter 9 ) . |
| 42 | On any assignment of an equitable interest , notice should be given to the trustees of the legal estate ( Dearle v Hall ( 1828 ) 3 Russ 1 ) ; but if the husband and wife are the trustees this is academic . |
| 43 | A further dose should be given to the pups at two months old , to eliminate any infection acquired from the milk of the dam or from any increase in faecal egg output by the dam in the weeks following whelping . |
| 44 | Where possible an indication should be given of the sub-system(s) and program(s) that are likely to be affected by the change . |
| 45 | Secondly , some description should be given of the characters , their moods , emotions and particular role in each part of the action . |
| 46 | Generally all that is required is that reasonable notice should be given of the terms as a whole . |
| 47 | The expert may need to do more than receive submissions , and directions should be given about the arrangements for physical inspections , site visits and the like . |
| 48 | If the expatriate and family are expected to find their own accommodation , information should be given on the types of properties available for rent , how much these are likely to cost together with information on whether they are furnished or unfurnished . |
| 49 | Details of the redemption terms and circumstances , means of determining the amount payable upon redemption , conversion terms and circumstances and means of determining the number and class of shares issued on conversion should be given in the notes . |
| 50 | He has been a vocal champion of the occasionally fashionable view that a company should be run in the interests of ‘ stakeholders ’ — its employees , suppliers and customers , and the regions where a company operates . |
| 51 | Although during his visit Miyazawa had suggested that compensation was an issue which should be decided by the courts , his immediate response to the formal compensation demand was that some form of recompense was necessary to demonstrate Japan 's remorse . |
| 52 | The UK abstained in the vote , arguing that health issues should be decided by the governments of member states . |
| 53 | By notice of appeal dated 22 April 1992 the father appealed on the grounds , inter alia , that ( 1 ) the judge was wrong in law to reject the submission that any consideration of the children 's welfare in the context of a judicial discretion under article 13 ( a ) of the Convention was relevant only as a material factor if it met the test of placing the children in an ‘ intolerable situation ’ under article 13 ( b ) ; ( 2 ) the judge should have limited considerations of welfare to the criteria for welfare laid down by the Convention itself ; ( 3 ) the judge was wrong in law to reject the submission that in the context of the exercise of the discretion permitted by article 13 ( a ) the court was limited to a consideration of the nature and quality of the father 's acquiescence ( as found by the Court of Appeal ) ; ( 4 ) in the premises , despite her acknowledgment that the exercise of her discretion had to be seen in the context of the Convention , the judge exercised a discretion based on a welfare test appropriate to wardship proceedings ; ( 5 ) the judge was further in error as a matter of law in not perceiving as the starting point for the exercise of her discretion the proposition that under the Convention the future of the children should be decided in the courts of the state from which they had been wrongfully removed ; ( 6 ) the judge , having found that on the ability to determine the issue between the parents there was little to choose between the Family Court of Australia and the High Court of England , was wrong not to conclude that as a consequence the mother had failed to displace the fundamental premise of the Convention that the future of the children should be decided in the courts of the country from which they had been wrongfully removed ; ( 7 ) the judge also misdirected herself when considering which court should decide the future of the children ( a ) by applying considerations more appropriate to the doctrine of forum conveniens and ( b ) by having regard to the likely outcome of the hearing in that court contrary to the principles set out in In re F. ( A Minor ) ( Abduction : Custody Rights ) [ 1991 ] Fam. 25 ; ( 8 ) in the alternative , if the judge was right to apply the forum conveniens approach , she failed to have regard to the following facts and matters : ( a ) that the parties were married in Australia ; ( b ) that the parties had spent the majority of their married life in Australia ; ( c ) that the children were born in Australia and were Australian citizens ; ( d ) that the children had spent the majority of their lives in Australia ; ( e ) the matters referred to in ground ( 9 ) ; ( 9 ) in any event on the facts the judge was wrong to find that there was little to choose between the Family Court of Australia and the High Court of England as fora for deciding the children 's future ; ( 11 ) the judge was wrong on the facts to find that there had been a change in the circumstances to which the mother would be returning in Australia given the findings made by Thorpe J. that ( a ) the former matrimonial home was to be sold ; ( b ) it would be unavailable for occupation by the mother and the children after 7 February 1992 ; and ( c ) there would be no financial support for the mother other than state benefits : matters which neither Thorpe J. nor the Court of Appeal found amounted to ‘ an intolerable situation . ’ |
| 54 | By notice of appeal dated 22 April 1992 the father appealed on the grounds , inter alia , that ( 1 ) the judge was wrong in law to reject the submission that any consideration of the children 's welfare in the context of a judicial discretion under article 13 ( a ) of the Convention was relevant only as a material factor if it met the test of placing the children in an ‘ intolerable situation ’ under article 13 ( b ) ; ( 2 ) the judge should have limited considerations of welfare to the criteria for welfare laid down by the Convention itself ; ( 3 ) the judge was wrong in law to reject the submission that in the context of the exercise of the discretion permitted by article 13 ( a ) the court was limited to a consideration of the nature and quality of the father 's acquiescence ( as found by the Court of Appeal ) ; ( 4 ) in the premises , despite her acknowledgment that the exercise of her discretion had to be seen in the context of the Convention , the judge exercised a discretion based on a welfare test appropriate to wardship proceedings ; ( 5 ) the judge was further in error as a matter of law in not perceiving as the starting point for the exercise of her discretion the proposition that under the Convention the future of the children should be decided in the courts of the state from which they had been wrongfully removed ; ( 6 ) the judge , having found that on the ability to determine the issue between the parents there was little to choose between the Family Court of Australia and the High Court of England , was wrong not to conclude that as a consequence the mother had failed to displace the fundamental premise of the Convention that the future of the children should be decided in the courts of the country from which they had been wrongfully removed ; ( 7 ) the judge also misdirected herself when considering which court should decide the future of the children ( a ) by applying considerations more appropriate to the doctrine of forum conveniens and ( b ) by having regard to the likely outcome of the hearing in that court contrary to the principles set out in In re F. ( A Minor ) ( Abduction : Custody Rights ) [ 1991 ] Fam. 25 ; ( 8 ) in the alternative , if the judge was right to apply the forum conveniens approach , she failed to have regard to the following facts and matters : ( a ) that the parties were married in Australia ; ( b ) that the parties had spent the majority of their married life in Australia ; ( c ) that the children were born in Australia and were Australian citizens ; ( d ) that the children had spent the majority of their lives in Australia ; ( e ) the matters referred to in ground ( 9 ) ; ( 9 ) in any event on the facts the judge was wrong to find that there was little to choose between the Family Court of Australia and the High Court of England as fora for deciding the children 's future ; ( 11 ) the judge was wrong on the facts to find that there had been a change in the circumstances to which the mother would be returning in Australia given the findings made by Thorpe J. that ( a ) the former matrimonial home was to be sold ; ( b ) it would be unavailable for occupation by the mother and the children after 7 February 1992 ; and ( c ) there would be no financial support for the mother other than state benefits : matters which neither Thorpe J. nor the Court of Appeal found amounted to ‘ an intolerable situation . ’ |
| 55 | This endorsement should be added to policies covering contents only , where the policyholder wishes to cover an item which is should be covered under the buildings section . |
| 56 | There would also be arguments concerning which ailments should be covered by the terms of private schemes . |
| 57 | The law respects the right of the shareholders to determine the objectives of their association through contract and accepts that by virtue of their capital contributions they should be regarded as the owners of the company . |
| 58 | The Nagas should be regarded as the initiates and the guardians of the ancient esoteric knowledge . |
| 59 | Details of the circumstances should be explained in the notes . |
| 60 | Next , for a four foot tank , an uplift should be fitted to the plate(s) at either end in the back corner . |