Example sentences of "[vb pp] out [prep] [noun sg] of [noun sg] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | At long last they 've come out in favour of wealth , is n't that extraordinary , reported in today 's paper . |
| 2 | Catholicism , for centuries , allied itself with conservative forces opposed to progress but now that elements within the church have come out in favour of change , they appear to be opting for a more socialist , rather than capitalist , line . |
| 3 | little research has been carried out on consistency of performance on similar test material , especially of mathematics in context . |
| 4 | Checks are carried out for retention of information relating to files which are to be offlined , those which have been offlined and those which are to be restored from the offline media . |
| 5 | Hazard and Operability Study A study carried out by application of guide words to identify all deviations from the design intent with undesired effects for safety or operability , ( Reference 6 ) . |
| 6 | The Inland Revenue has commented further on the tax treatment of ex gratia payments made on the termination of an office or employment , as set out in Statement of Practice SP 13/91 . |
| 7 | where defendants conduct leads plaintiff to incur expense in the reasonable belief that the action will proceed to trial regardless of the plaintiffs delay , the defendant is estopped from claiming that the action should be struck out for want of prosecution on the grounds of delay — even if the E limitation period has expired . |
| 8 | where a defendants conduct led the plaintiff to incur expenditure in the reasonable belief that the action was to proceed to trial regardless of the plaintiffs delay even where the limitation period had expired , the defendant was estopped from claiming that the action be struck out for want of prosecution on the grounds of the plaintiffs delay . |
| 9 | It is also clear from Walkley v Precision Forgings [ 1979 ] 1 WLR 606 and Chappell v Cooper [ 1980 ] 2 All ER 463 that where the plaintiff commences an action during the primary s11 or s12 limitation period but then puts himself in a position where he can not pursue it , for instance by letting his writ expire without service or delaying so much that his action is struck out for want of prosecution , the court will have no power to exercise s33 discretion , since it is the plaintiff 's own action or default which has prejudiced him and not the operation of s11 or 12 . |
| 10 | Also it seems that if the plaintiff 's first action is at risk of being struck out for want of prosecution , it is not an abuse of the process of the court to issue a second writ as there has been no disobedience of a peremptory order of the court ( Bailey v Bailey [ 1984 ] RTR 167 ) . |