Example sentences of "of [art] [noun pl] act " in BNC.

  Previous page   Next page
No Sentence
31 He reiterated an annual appeal for the repeal of the Secrets Act .
32 However , says Dr Collier , the infamous Section 118 of the Medicines Act means that the Department of Health 's Medicines Control Agency , unlike the American Food and Drugs Administration , ‘ can hide virtually all of their activities , including incompetence , behind a cloak of secrecy ’ .
33 The Department of Health has cultivated the myth for some years that section 118 of the Medicines Act is the only reason why it is prevented from explaining the decisions of the licensing authority in general or the recommendations of the Committee on Safety of Medicines , based on doctors ' reports of adverse reactions , in particular .
34 The provisions of section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act have already been considered ( see paragraph 5–32 above ) .
35 One particular exception which may well apply is that contained in sections 8 of the Factors Act and 24 of the Sale of Goods Act .
36 Also note that , since Lee v. Butler , sections 9 of the Factors Act and 25 of the Sale of Goods Act have been amended .
37 Therefore since all the requirements in section 2 of the Factors Act were fulfilled , the innocent purchaser had good title to the tapestry .
38 Thus , a mercantile agent in possession of the registration book but not of the vehicle itself can not confer good title under section 2 of the Factors Act , Beverley Acceptances v. Oakely ( 1982 C.A. ) .
39 The mercantile agent then will not confer good title on X under section 2 of the Factors Act if he does not make the contract of sale with X until after he has returned the goods to their true owner , Beverley Acceptances v. Oakley .
40 Therefore the garage can not confer good title under section 2 of the Factors Act .
41 It was held that all the requirements of section 2 of the Factors Act were complied with including the requirement that the mercantile agent be in possession of goods or of the documents of title with the consent of ‘ the owner . ’
42 Two provisions in two different statutes are almost identical , section 24 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 8 of the Factors Act 1889 .
43 The statutory provisions in section 8 of the Factors Act and section 24 of the Sale of Goods Act constitute one of those exceptions and were designed specifically to help someone in C's position .
44 The most likely exception is that contained in two almost –33 identical statutory provisions , section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act 1889 .
45 Therefore if the hirer sells the goods , section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act will not operate to give his purchaser a good title .
46 A buyer under a conditional sale agreement which is a consumer credit agreement within the meaning of that Act ( see Chapter 19 ) , is for the purposes of section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act , not someone who has ‘ bought or agreed to buy , ’ ( Consumer Credit Act 1974 , Schedule 4 and section 25(2) of the Sale of Goods Act ) .
47 However , if the transaction falls within section 25 ( or section 9 of the Factors Act ) , he can pass on a good title even after his voidable title has been avoided , Newtons of Wembley v. Williams ( 1965 C.A. ) .
48 The Court of Appeal held that the innocent purchaser acquired good title under section 9 of the Factors Act .
49 It is , however , implicit in the closing words of both section 9 of the Factors Act and section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act .
50 We have seen that section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act typically apply where a seller lets his buyer take possession but retains property ( title to the goods ) until the buyer pays the price .
51 Section 37 of the Solicitors Act 1843 ( 6 & 7 Vict. c. 73 ) provided that no solicitor could commence an action for fees until one month after he delivered to his client a bill of fees .
52 Similarly , I think section 37 of the Solicitors Act 1843 deals , not with the right of the solicitor , but with the procedure to enforce that right .
53 The debtor obtained an order from the county court that the statutory demand and bankruptcy petition be set aside on the ground that the service of the statutory demand had contravened the provision in section 69(1) of the Solicitors Act 1974 that ‘ no action shall be brought ’ to recover any costs due to a solicitor within one month of the bill having been delivered .
54 Held , allowing the appeal , that although ‘ action ’ in section 69 of the Solicitors Act 1974 was to be construed liberally it could extend only to forms of legal process and did not embrace a statutory demand , the service of which was merely part of the statutorily prescribed procedure for obtaining remedies afforded to creditors by a bankruptcy order and did not of itself initiate legal proceedings ; that a solicitor was therefore not debarred by section 69(1) from serving a statutory demand for payment of his costs before the expiration of one month from the date of delivery of his bill of costs ; and that , accordingly , since the statutory demand and petition were valid , they would be remitted to the district judge for hearing ( post , pp. 1029E–F , G — 1030A , 1031E ) .
55 On 28 January 1992 District Judge Harris sitting in the Liverpool County Court granted the debtor 's application to set aside a statutory demand dated 15 August 1991 which had been served on the debtor on 21 August 1991 by the creditors , Marshalls , a firm of solicitors , in respect of their unpaid bill of 31 July 1991 , and dismissed the bankruptcy petition founded on that demand , which had been issued on 20 September 1991 , on the basis that the service of the statutory demand had contravened section 69(1) of the Solicitors Act 1974 .
56 By a notice of appeal dated 25 February 1992 the creditors appealed on the ground , inter alia , that the service of a statutory demand was not the bringing of an action and therefore did not contravene section 69 of the Solicitors Act 1974 .
57 In the end it seemed to be more or less common ground that the judge did not formally state his reasons when he made his order , although in the course of argument he had indicated that he had sympathy for the debtor 's argument based on section 69 of the Solicitors Act 1974 .
58 Counsel for the debtor relied on section 69(1) of the Solicitors Act 1974 :
59 Some reliance was also placed on the fact that the 31 July bill did not comply with the requirements of section 67 of the Solicitors Act 1974 .
60 The Assistant Director was acting under the authority of a Council resolution made under Section 79 of the Solicitors Act 1974 [ as substituted by Section 97 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 ] .
  Previous page   Next page