Example sentences of "under [noun sg] [no cls] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 This is under Concession B18 .
2 Departing in October 1904 , it eventually reached the waters between Japan and Korea in May 1905 ( after a tortuous journey round the Cape of Good Hope ) , only to be virtually annihilated by a Japanese fleet under Admiral Tó0gó0 Heihachiró0 in the Straits of Tsushima .
3 LCH has authority under reg 15A to " effect the settlement or revaluation of open contracts … in accordance with a clearing processing system " adopted by the relevant exchange .
4 The identity of such marginal groups has sometimes changed , as presidents change : the Kikuyu were ‘ in ’ under Kenyatta and are ‘ out ’ under President Moi ; the Bemba were ‘ in ’ under President Kaunda in the 1960s , but have been ‘ out ’ since Simon Kapwepwe broke away in 1971 .
5 under Sub-Section 2(a) unless the person driving holds a licence to drive such car or has held and is not disqualified for holding or obtaining such a licence
6 The privileges and duties to refuse to give evidence contained in Article 11513 are also available under Chapter II514 .
7 In other words , under the misappropriation theory it is clear that no breach of duty to the issuer of the securities traded in , is required , provided there has been a breach of duty to another person ; however , under Rule 14e-3 it is not necessary for any fiduciary duty to be owed or breached .
8 Under rule 6.5(4) of the Insolvency Rules 1986 ( S.I .
9 However , under rule 7.3(10) the member may , once the notice is served , apply to the board to rescind it , and under rule 7.3(11) may appeal against the notice to the Appeal Tribunal .
10 The remaining 74 are not quoted on any recognised exchange , although many can be traded by members under rule 535(2) .
11 The judge 's failure to apply the correct test in this respect was compounded by the fact that he was deprived of the material which was necessary for the proper exercise of his discretion because of his failure to require that the mother be notified of the foster mother 's application for leave under rule 4.3(2) ( b ) of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 .
12 The board did so meet and resolved to exercise its powers of intervention under rule 7.3(2) of the Lautro Rules .
13 The board did so meet and resolved to exercise its powers of intervention under rule 7.3(2) of the Lautro Rules .
14 However , under rule 7.3(10) the member may , once the notice is served , apply to the board to rescind it , and under rule 7.3(11) may appeal against the notice to the Appeal Tribunal .
15 That investigation had been initiated under rule 7.9(1) ( b ) of the Rules on the direction of the Chief Executive to the chief enforcement officer in the light of evidence that had come to Lautro 's attention suggesting that Norwich Union might have been in breach of various of the rules in failing adequately to monitor the business and operations of the Winchester Group and to ensure compliance with the Code of Conduct .
16 Therefore , a lawyer , a financial analyst , an accountant , or journalist , aware of inside information relating to a company in whose shares he trades , is liable under Rule 10b-5 notwithstanding the absence of a fiduciary duty to the issuer of the securities provided there is at least a duty owed to another person — here the law firm , the financial intermediary , the accountancy firm , or the newspaper .
17 Consequently , all investors who had purchased Douglas Aircraft stock between the date when the defendant first traded and the date when the disclosure was finally made were prima facie eligible to bring a private action under Rule 10b-5 .
18 They lodged with the court a confidential ‘ statement of grounds ’ in support of an application ex parte , under rule 9.2(1) ( 4 ) of the Insolvency Rules 1986 ( S.I .
19 It is expected moreover that Cornwall with a rapidly growing population , one of the most grow rapidly growing in the country will not in any case remain much under quota er for very long .
20 The feature stated that the Lieutenancy records have not survived ; however , the Public Records Office at Kew does have the pay returns for the unit under reference WO13 4353 .
21 Improvement ensued under Tub LM1 ( again taken from a 5ml dropper bottle ) although the patient commented that the wheeziness was n't as clear as it had been on the first Phosphorus .
22 Ireland , for its part , argued that the requirements at issue were justified under article 56(1) of the E.E.C .
23 ( b ) In English law the choice of law rules governing claims for restitution are influenced by the claim being connected with a contract , having regard to the English conflict of laws rule that the proper law of the obligation to restore a benefit , if the obligation arises in connection with a contract , is the proper law of the contract : Dicey & Morris , The Conflict of Laws , 11th ed. ( 1987 ) , p. 1350 , r. 203. ( c ) Quasi-contractual claims , at least where there is a contract involved , should probably fall per se under article 5(1) : see the opinion of the editors of Dicey & Morris , at p. 341 , to this effect , and the decision of the Scottish courts that a statutory claim to contribution falls within the article in Engdiv Ltd. v. G. Percy Trentham Ltd. , 1990 S.L.T. 617 , 621. ( d ) In the case of a claim for the return of moneys paid under an ineffective contract , there is no artificiality in deducing an implied promise to pay , even though the old theory that restitution was based on the concept of such an implied promise is now largely discredited .
24 In Union Transport Plc. v. Continental Lines S.A. [ 1992 ] 1 W.L.R. 15 the House of Lords held that under article 5(1) of the Brussels Convention the court 's jurisdiction was to be determined by the place of performance of the principal obligation in the contract , applying the Court of Justice decision in Ets . A. de Bloos S.P.R.L. v. Société en commandite par actions Bouyer ( Case 14/76 ) [ 1976 ] E.C.R. 1497 described in the speech of Lord Goff of Chieveley [ 1992 ] 1 W.L.R. 15 , 19 :
25 This conclusion is , I think , reinforced by the de Bloos [ 1976 ] E.C.R. 1497 and Union Transport [ 1992 ] 1 W.L.R. 15 cases , showing that the word ‘ obligation ’ in article 5(1) refers to the contractual obligation forming the basis of the legal proceedings ; and also by the interpretation by the Court of Appeal of the Effer case [ 1982 ] E.C.R. 825 in the Tesam case [ 1990 ] I.L.Pr. 149 , showing that where there is no evidence of the existence of a contract , and therefore no real dispute as to its existence , the court has no jurisdiction under article 5(1) .
26 It is therefore for the domestic courts to decide whether , in any particular case , the agreement does so clearly infringe Article 85 that an exemption is very unlikely to be granted by the Commission , even if it has been notified to the Commission , or whether there is no infringement of Article 85 and therefore the question of an exemption under Article 85(3) does not come into play .
27 Subject to the Commission 's exclusive competence to grant exemptions under Article 85(3) , both the Commission and national courts will have full powers to apply Article 85 under the Philip Morris doctrine to any acquisition of an interest in a competitor , whatever the combined turnover of the companies involved , which does not constitute a ‘ concentration ’ as defined in the Merger Regulation .
28 It may be exempted under Article 85(3) if it contributes to improving production or distribution of goods or promoting technical or economic progress while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit .
29 Such agreements might however be exempted under Article 85(3) , since co-operation in R&D work and in the exploitation of the results generally promotes technical and economic progress , which in turn benefits consumers through the introduction of new and improved products .
30 For example , it is possible for firms to apply for exemption for agreements under Article 85(3) , even where the agreement is not covered by the block exemptions described above .
  Next page