Example sentences of "i five [noun] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 I I suppose in the in the light of what 's been said I I am slightly uneasy erm particularly going back to the erm I five discussion that that we had yesterday and you you 'll be aware that part of our objection to the erm the policy put forward by the county council re related to the specific wording of the of the policy and the the flexibility available to local authorities in in terms of allocating land erm that best serves the needs of potential developers and investors .
2 But I just I simply need to point out that these I five allocations are targeted at twenty eight percent of the workforce .
3 Erm the er desire that I twelve conveys to encourage district councils to make special provision in their you know to emphasize high density employment in their city centres is understood , no quarrel with that , but if you ca n't , if you feel unable er at county level to be absolutely explicit , that a district would be free if it so chose , it might not choose to do so , if it so chose to make I twelve decisions that did n't come out of its I five , er they would n't have to come out of its I five allocations , unless you can be clear that they 're free to do that , erm it suggests to me sir that may be it 's I twelve that 's that 's getting in the way , erm and w that might well be something we can do without .
4 A strategic site if it comes forward would be away from the main urban areas and would only be available for developments that could not otherwise take place on the I five allocations .
5 I was trying to clarify they do n't make a contribution to the I five provision .
6 They make a contribution to employment by virtue of an increase in employment density or or not , depending on whether that increase actually takes place but they do not contribute to the I five provision by virtue of not being a change of use .
7 Well if they 're within existing industrial areas , then they 're not included in the I five provision are they ?
8 There is no such restriction on any I five provision .
9 Can I just say on this sir that we we see policy I five as our interp sorry I twelve , it 's our interpretation that it 's really a recognition that office development is appropriate in or adjacent to er town centres and that we wo n't be seeking to er identify offices in or adjacent to town centres and take that element off the I five provision .
10 of im of I five land .
11 In the Naburn hospital allocation it 's , there is eleven H A for I five land and then there 's a remaining allocation for retail
12 So if you count only the I five land , you get a figure of thirty two point six hectares
13 which needs to be deducted from the hundred and ten point two seven which gives you a re a possible alloca a possible amount of land to come forward in the structure plan period of seventy seven point six seven , off which to make the figures round properly you need to take another ten , for the retail element if that became I five land which could theoretically give you a figure of sixty seven point six seven .
14 erm all other types of employment other than I five type employment .
15 Now I 'm I find it particularly strange that paragraph sixty one of N Y seven does n't give any hint erm that the District Council was concerned about I I five figures until we were
16 Er that in my view wo n't happen because the I five sites we will still be allocating in and around the main urban areas .
17 If if er I five sites have been taken up and employment needs of districts have been addressed and the county in general have been addressed , then er an inward investment would n't provide or offer substantial proven employment benefits .
18 Be because the I five policy is aimed at a specific area of the workforce , it 's not it 's not across the full spectrum .
19 Erm it 's also acknowledged in paragraph thirteen of N Y six , but this this factor means that some of the development which takes place on the on a land allocated for I five wo n't actually go towards meeting the I five target , it 'll be lost in terms of I four .
20 I mean i what what we 're looking for is is the overall figure of this revised assessment of land availability for I five uses in the plan period , and your residue figure would be the one which would not likely to be made available before the year two thousand and six .
21 It 'd be perfectly proper if there were new local government offices to be built for them to be located on an I five site .
22 Is the implication of what you 've just said to the Chairman that you agree with Mr Allenby that this animal is a different one than anything that might go to an I five site ?
23 It means that any office development or commercial of this kind in this I twelve policy that was to occur in Harrogate would not be counted off the sixty hectares of em erm of I five allocation , it would be in addition to it , and that may be a very important breakthrough for us .
24 I I think I 'm quite able to confirm that it is within the district power to determine that erm the I five allocation should be separate from the I twelve .
25 Erm the fact of the matter is sir as you 'll have detected from today 's earlier discussions it rather suits me policy I twelve because it gives a local authority the ability to plan for employment development in addition to their I five allocation .
26 Firstly , the council could have opted for a significant increase in the er I five allocation and to go on to see to identify a site in the local plan .
27 No we 're not looking for an increase in our I five allocation .
28 We support the I five allocation .
29 So picking the bones out of that , it 's size , composition , economic significance and locational requirement means that you ca n't bed it down in your ordinary I five allocation .
30 They see that their I five allocation is sufficient .
  Next page