Example sentences of "[prep] 1986 [art] [noun sg] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 After 1986 the wording of most policies was changed to shorten the period during which claims may be made .
2 After 1986 the ratio began to edge upwards again as incomes increased , with growing prosperity in the economy raising the yield from direct taxes .
3 However , assuming that it is and that Winchester became for the purposes of the Act of 1986 a member of Lautro , then the assumption does not lead to any relevant conclusion .
4 At the end of 1986 a group of professors , doctors and nutritionists in Britain produced a book repudiating ‘ crude and simplistic propaganda ’ about foods alleged to be healthy and unhealthy .
5 In the early part of 1986 a number of local authorities throughout the UK instructed the libraries under their jurisdiction ( mainly public libraries , but also a number of college libraries ) to suspend their subscriptions to newspapers and periodicals published by News International .
6 By a notice of appeal dated 22 July 1991 the administrators appealed on the grounds , inter alia , that ( 1 ) the judge had erred in law in holding that the court had no jurisdiction to make any order under section 238 of the Act of 1986 against the bank ; ( 2 ) the judge should have held that the words ‘ any person ’ in section 238 meant ( in the case of a company ) any company , whether or not registered in England and Wales , or having a place of business in England and Wales , or carrying on business in England and Wales at the time of the transaction complained of ; alternatively , that those words ( in the case of a company ) meant any company with a sufficient connection with England and Wales : and that , on the facts of the case , there was a sufficient connection ; and in either case the court accordingly had jurisdiction to entertain the originating application against the bank , and to grant leave under rule 12.12 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 to serve the bank in Jersey ; and ( 3 ) in construing section 238 of the Act of 1986 the judge had erred in failing ( i ) to hold that the bank , even though a Jersey company , was within the class of persons with respect to whom Parliament was to be presumed to be legislating in section 238 ; ( ii ) to give any or any sufficient weight to the mischief which the section was intended to remedy , and/or to the disastrous practical consequences for all insolvencies with any international element if the operation of the section were limited to those within England and Wales at the time of the transaction complained of ; ( iii ) to give any or any sufficient weight to the legislative context of the section and related sections ; and ( iv ) to give any or any sufficient weight to the fact that the transactions dealt with by the sections necessarily had a connection with England and Wales in that they involved a disposition of the property of a person or company the subject of insolvency proceedings before the courts of England and Wales .
7 By virtue of sections 423(2) and 238 of the Act of 1986 the court has an overall discretion wide enough to enable it , if justice so requires , to make no order against the other party to the transaction .
8 By a notice of appeal dated 6 September 1991 the solicitors appealed on the grounds that ( 1 ) the judge was wrong in law in holding that ( a ) under section 6(2) of the Act of 1986 the court had jurisdiction to order any person other than the contravener who appeared to the court to have been knowingly concerned in the contravention of section 3 of the Act to repay to investors sums paid by them to Pantell and ( b ) under section 61(1) of the Act the court had jurisdiction to order any person other than the contravener who appeared to the court to have been knowingly concerned in the contravention of any rules , regulations or provisions referred to in that section to repay to investors sums paid by them to Pantell ; ( 2 ) the court had no jurisdiction under sections 6(2) and 61(1) to award claims for compensation for loss against persons knowingly concerned in such contraventions in contrast to sections 6(3) to ( 7 ) and sections 61(3) to ( 7 ) ; ( 3 ) the judge was wrong in law in holding that ( a ) the power of the court under section 6(2) to order a person knowingly concerned in the contravention to take such steps as the court might direct for restoring the parties to the transaction to the position in which they were before the transaction was entered into and ( b ) the power of the court under section 61(1) to order a person knowingly concerned in the contravention of the rules , regulations or provisions referred to in that section to take such steps as the court might direct to remedy it included power to make a financial award against such person directing payment by that person to individual investors of sums equivalent to the amounts paid by such investors pursuant to the said transaction , neither subsection empowering the court to order restitution by the repayment of moneys outside the possession or control of the person concerned ; and ( 4 ) the judge erred in law ( a ) in his construction of sections 6(2) and 61(1) in failing to have regard to the principle ‘ generalibus specialia derogant , ’ in particular in holding that there could exist within each of sections 6 and 61 two parallel powers to order financial redress at the suit of the plaintiff , one derived from sections 6(3) and 6(4) and sections 61(3) and 61(4) respectively , which was subject to the limitations set out in those and subsequent subsections , and the other derived from section 6(2) and section 61(1) , which was subject to no such limitations ; ( b ) in rejecting the submission that sections 6 and 61 were essentially procedural and did not create new substantive legal rights and remedies ; and ( c ) in failing to have regard to the fact that the orders sought under paragraphs 11 and 13 of the prayer to the amended statement of claim required payment to the plaintiff or alternatively into court of moneys recovered thereunder from the solicitors despite the absence of any provisions for such orders in the Act , his dismissal of the summons being inconsistent with his finding that there was no provision in sections 6(2) or 61(1) directing payment into court and that any order under the sections would have to direct repayment of the sum paid to each individual investor who had made the original payment .
9 During the early part of 1986 the Director will visit all Social Work Departments and major voluntary agencies in Scotland , academic institutions and other research centres .
10 Towards the end of 1986 an AEC was launched and has been running ever since .
11 In 1986 a law was passed that required donations to be valued at cost rather than an invented ‘ appreciated ’ value for tax purposes — though only in cases where the deductions would reduce the donor 's tax bill to zero .
12 Through SHACE , meetings of subject specialists , related to the Higher National Diploma , now take place and this organisation , under the chairmanship of a member of Sector O Board , was able to assist SCOTVEC when in 1986 a revision of the Higher National Diploma was required to retain exemption status from the Hotel , Catering and Institutional Management ( HCIMA ) Professional examination .
13 1.3 In 1986 a Module Development Group was formed and considered the case for change .
14 Mr. Burgess is a solicitor who was in 1986 a partner in the firm of Marsland and Barber of Margate .
15 In 1986 a report commissioned by the Home Office estimated that prison officers worked an average of 16 hours per week overtime , but that prisons could be run safely and efficiently if officers worked on average eight hours less but with revised shift systems and working practices .
16 In 1986 the landlord granted permission for the defendant company to assign to M. , the first defendant , who likewise covenanted directly with the landlord to pay the rent and observe the other covenants , and an assignment was entered into whereby the lease was assigned to M. for the residue of the term .
17 In 1986 the government reversed itself and cut employers ' contributions to the fund ( though they have since been allowed to rise again ) .
18 In 1986 the government appointed Sir Roy Griffiths , the private sector consultant behind the earlier general management reforms in the NHS , to carry out an inquiry into community care .
19 In 1986 the government launched a second scheme under the title of ‘ Helping the Community to Care ’ .
20 In 1986 the Court of Appeal laid down the basic rules on competition by ex-employees in Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler 1986 IRLR 69 .
21 However , in 1986 the Court of Appeal gave its approval to a much less interventionist approach : " Scum " was a powerful drama about the treatment of young offenders , which depicted the Borstal system as encouraging rather than deterring violent behaviour .
22 He later joined the CNES management , before becoming in 1986 the secretary general of the Eureka committee — the French-inspired project for European co-operation in high technologies .
23 However , as can be seen from Table 4.1 , in 1986 the ratio , at 13 per cent , was nearly twice the required minimum .
24 In 1986 the Management Committee of Brent CAB decided that action should be taken to advance the advice needs of the large ethnic minority community in Brent .
25 In 1986 the minister set BR the target of a further 25 per cent reduction by 1990 .
26 In 1986 the Company 's worldwide fertilizer business , of which ICIF represents the lion 's share , was in the red to the tune of £21m on sales of £915m .
27 In 1986 the fund paid out £1.3 million to customers of fifteen failed holiday firms .
28 In 1986 the loss is estimated at more than $100 billion .
29 In 1986 the group recruited Victor Millar from accountants Arthur Andersen to head its consulting business .
30 In 1986 the rump of USO also joined the UGT .
  Next page