Example sentences of "[adv] [verb] to claim " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | These changes only apply to Claims Branch in Bootle . |
| 2 | all consequences suffered by the Carrier ( including but not limited to claims , demands , proceedings , fines , penalties , damages , costs , expenses , and loss of or damage to the carrying vehicle and to other goods carried ) of any error , omission , mis-statement or misrepresentation by the Trader or other owner of the goods or by any servant or agent of either of them , insufficient or improper packing , labelling or addressing of the goods or fraud as in Condition 10 : |
| 3 | The scheme does not apply to claims for an amount greater than £1,500 per person or £7,500 per Booking Form or to claims which are solely or mainly in respect of physical injury or illness . |
| 4 | The Scheme does not apply to claims for an amount larger that £1,500 per person . |
| 5 | The scheme does not apply to claims for an amount greater than £1,500 per person . |
| 6 | It does not apply to claims which are solely or mainly in respect of physical injury or illness or the consequences of such injury or illness . |
| 7 | This paragraph does not apply to claims relating to death , bodily injury , illness or personal property . |
| 8 | The scheme does not apply to claims for an amount greater than £1,500 per person . |
| 9 | The scheme does not apply to claims for amounts greater than £1,500 per person or £75,00 per booking form . |
| 10 | Held , allowing the application , that the provision in article 5(1) of the 1968 Convention conferring special jurisdiction in respect of ‘ matters relating to a contract ’ required the existence of either a contractual relationship between the parties giving rise to actual contractual obligations , or a consensual relationship closely akin to a contract and with comparable obligations ; and that , since the transactions between the plaintiffs and defendants had been void ab initio , no contracts existed within the meaning of article 5(1) ; that the jurisdiction under article 5(3) was restricted to claims based on tort , delict or quasi-delict and did not extend to claims for restitution ; that article 6(1) was not applicable since under the terms of the order of Steyn J. the restitution claims would not be heard and determined together and , in any event , any irreconcilable judgments would be subject to a final decision of the House of Lords , binding in both England and Scotland ; and that , accordingly , there were no grounds for invoking the special jurisdiction to allow the defendants to be sued in England ( post , pp. 836F , 837B–D , 838E , 840B–D , 842H — 843B , G , G–H ) . |