Example sentences of "[verb] to [art] defendant " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 In Seager v Copydex Ltd [ 1967 ] 1 WLR 923 it was adopted by Lord Denning MR who added the following point concerning the difficulties which arise where part of the information disclosed to the defendant is only partly within the public domain : When the information is mixed , being partly public and partly private , then the recipient must take special care to use only the material which is in the public domain .
2 ( 4 ) In determining the value of an action under paragraph ( 1 ) ( a ) : ( a ) the sum which the plaintiff or applicant reasonably expects to recover shall be reduced by the amount of any debt which he admits that he owes to a defendant in that action and which arises from the circumstances which give rise to the action ; ( b ) no account shall be taken of a possible finding of contributory negligence , except to the extent , if any , that such negligence is admitted ; ( c ) where the plaintiff seeks an award of provisional damages as described in s 32A(2) ( a ) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 , no account shall be taken of the possibility of a future application for further damages ; ( d ) the value shall be taken to include sums which , by virtue of s 22 of the Social Security Act 1989 , are required to be paid to the Secretary of State .
3 However , section 138 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 protects the purchaser from this provided that when he bought the goods he was bona fide and unaware of any writ of execution relating to the defendant .
4 If , on the other hand , it never occurred to the defendant that the victim was young or mentally abnormal , and he was not aware therefore that he was in a situation of potential risk , he should not be liable for rape providing that he took reasonable steps to ascertain that she did agree to vaginal penetration , for in such a case his conduct is reasonable in the light of the facts as he perceived them to be .
5 This was never a very promising argument , seeing that the notice is addressed to the defendants and not to the plaintiffs , and the defendants themselves have made it clear that they have no difficulty in understanding it and complying with it .
6 Galliher the court ordered the defendant to disclose full particulars of a flat in Paris ( which was thought to contain valuable pictures and objets d'art allegedly transferred to the defendant in fraud of the creditors of another ) , to verify the information on affidavit , and to permit a named French avocat to inspect the contents of the flat .
7 In an action for a liquidated sum , the proceedings will be automatically transferred to the defendant 's home court ( if the action was commenced elsewhere ) upon the filing of a defence or , in the case where the defendant states that he has already paid the amount claimed , upon the plaintiff confirming in writing to the court that he wishes the proceedings to continue ( Ord 9 , r 2(8) ) .
8 Now it seems to me with erm with great respect from the view of the taxing officer , that er it 's quite clear that er both parties were holding han were holding their hands in relation to a question of taxation because negotiations were going on between the parties and indeed the defendants were being requested er not to proceed with taxation but to see if they could obtain an overall assessment and the point was met to the defendants barrister , telling quite frankly there would n't be much advantage in the defendants pushing on with erm taxation because they 'd only , they would have to look to his interest in the property to get payment , it seems to me in those circumstances that it can not be said that erm the plaintiffs were in any way acting improperly and not seeking to have the costs taxed during the period while the negotiations were being carried on er because effectively and
9 Questions of a possible denial of free speech arise in particular where the ‘ expression ’ is not a reprehensible exploitation of the defendant 's notoriety but is a literary production only loosely related to the defendant 's crimes .
10 ( The concessions related to the defendant 's entitlement to make use of any recollection they might have of the names and addresses of the plaintiff 's customers as well as the most convenient routes by which the premises of such customers could be reached .
11 According to the defendants ' version of events , a women had approached Khmara for help , claiming that a man had attacked her ; Khmara and his companions then tried to make a citizen 's arrest on the man , unaware that he was a KGB officer .
12 There were exceptions , recognised by the statute and the courts , but this was not such a case ; all that could be said was that economic damage , perhaps very severe , might be done to the defendant if publicity were not withheld .
13 On 16th April 1973 the estate agents had written to the defendants drawing attention to the existence of the counter-inflationary measures then in force and concluding with the sentence : ‘ I would also confirm that should you be successful in acquiring these premises then it will be necessary for us to look to you for payment of our fees as based on the commercial scales of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors . ’
14 The plaintiffs relied on an express term set out in the letters of appointments written to the defendants as follows : You will not disclose any of the company 's affairs or any of its subsidiary or associated companies business or trade secrets to a third party either during or after you have ceased to be an employee of the company without the express written consent of the company .
15 There should have been either detriment to the plaintiff , or benefit to the defendant : 1 Selwyn 's N.P. 45 ( 9th ed . ) .
16 By a lease under seal made on September 24 , 1937 , the plaintiffs , Central London Property Trust Ltd. , granted to the defendants High Trees House Ltd. , a subsidiary of the plaintiff company , a tenancy of a block of flats for the term of 99 years from September 29 , 1937 , at a ground rent of £2,500 a year .
17 Furthermore , the judgment court can transfer the application once made to the defendant 's court for hearing under Ord 16 , r 1(c) .
18 They went on over a long period and affected many children who had been entrusted to the defendants for care and help .
19 With reference to incident ( e ) , the deposition attributed to the defendant the statement that he would ‘ do something drastic . ’
20 Section 5(3) affords to the defendant a number of defences relating to lack of fault that are not available on a charge under section 4 .
21 Nevertheless , the mere submission to a medical examination does not entitle the plaintiff to see the report produced to the defendant as a result of that examination .
22 How should you put a figure of profit costs to the defendants ?
23 In Shiffman v. Order of St. John , for instance , the plaintiff was injured in Hyde Park when he was struck by a falling flag-pole belonging to the defendants .
24 The gas had percolated into the hotel basement from a fractured welded joint in an intermediate pressure main situated below street level and belonging to the defendants , a public utility company .
25 a private action brought in respect of an odour nuisance caused by stables belonging to the defendant .
26 ( b ) The duty of a criminal judge is not to determine the degree of moral responsibility of a delinquent but his material guilt or physical responsibility , and this once proven , to fix the form of social preservation best suited to the defendant according to the anthropological category to which he belongs .
27 Once these matters are established the burden shifts to the defendants .
28 In the common case where the act or neglect of the defendant and the injury to the plaintiff are for all practical purposes contemporaneous , the duty attaches to the defendant and is breached when the act or neglect occurs . …
29 If proceedings have been issued you may be required to contribute to the Defendants ' legal costs , but this will usually be limited to the same amount that you contributed to the Legal Aid Board in respect of your own legal costs .
30 Lord Tenterden C.J. went on to point out that the defendant in the first action would not have been relieved from having to contribute to the defendant in the second case if the latter had been compelled to pay a larger portion than his share .
  Next page