Example sentences of "[prep] [art] [noun pl] [noun sg] [num] the " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Under the provision of the Companies Act 1989 the Secretary of State has powers to seek a ruling from the courts , under a new civil procedure , on whether a company 's accounts comply with the provisions of the Companies Act 1985 .
2 By ss. 10 and 12 of the Companies Act 1985 the memorandum of association , together with the articles of association , are to be delivered to the Registrar of Companies , who retains and registers them .
3 ‘ That where they are generally authorised for the purpose of Section 80 of the Companies Act 1985 the Directors be and they are hereby empowered pursuant to Section 95 of the said Act to allot equity securities ( within the meaning of Section 94 of the said Act ) for cash , as if Section 89(1) of the said Act did not apply to any such allotment provided that this power shall :
4 The plaintiffs , a borough council , brought proceedings under section 222 of the Local Government Act 1972 and applied for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the defendants from using shop premises of theirs for trade on Sundays in breach of section 47 of the Shops Act 1950 The defendants resisted the claim against them on the ground , inter alia , that section 47 was in conflict with article 30 of the E.E.C .
5 By applications dated 13 December 1991 pursuant to section 10(9) of the Children Act 1989 the foster mother sought leave to apply for residence orders under section 8 of the Act of 1989 in respect of the children .
6 By a notice of appeal dated 1 June 1992 W. appealed on the grounds that ( 1 ) the High Court had no jurisdiction , or alternatively no jurisdiction should be exercised , to overrule the refusal of a competent minor aged 16 to undergo medical treatment ; ( 2 ) section 8 of the Family Law Reform Act 1969 should have been applied ; ( 3 ) the judge had erred in applying observations of Lord Donaldson of Lymington M.R. in In re R. ( A Minor ) ( Wardship : Consent to Treatment ) [ 1992 ] Fam. 11 which were erroneous ; ( 4 ) the judge had wrongly found that in respect of the Children Act 1989 the minor 's right of refusal was limited to the stage of assessment ; and ( 5 ) the judge had failed to have sufficient regard to the medical evidence against transferring W. , to the advantages of not moving her and to her wishes and his decision was plainly wrong .
7 Under section 22(3) of the Children Act 1989 the local authority has the duty ‘ to safeguard and promote the welfare ’ of children in care and , in my judgment , responsibility for the care of the child is firmly with the local authority once a care order is made .
8 The order is an unusual one in that in proceedings under the Children Act 1989 the justices ordered that the local authority involved in those proceedings should pay to another party the costs of that party in the sum of no less than £7,171.50 .
9 I hold that on an appeal to the High Court under the Children Act 1989 the only findings of fact and the only reasons that may be relied on to support the decision of the justices under appeal , are those announced by the justices in accordance with rule 21 .
10 In proceedings under the Children Act 1989 the parties must disclose the substance of any oral evidence they propose to call in advance of the hearing .
11 As a result of changes effected by the Companies Act 1989 the objects clause no longer limits the company 's capacity , or at least , the validity of an act may no longer be ‘ called into question on the ground of lack of capacity ’ .
  Next page