Example sentences of "v. times " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | [ COURT OF APPEAL ] DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL v. TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD. and Others 1992 Jan. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ; |
| 2 | Electrical , Electronic , Telecommunication and Plumbing Union v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1980 ] Q.B. 585 ; [ 1980 ] 3 W.L.R. 98 ; [ 1980 ] 1 All E.R. |
| 3 | Attorney-General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1974 ] A.C. 273 ; [ 1973 ] 3 W.L.R. 298 ; [ 1973 ] 3 All E.R. |
| 4 | Oyston v. Times Newspapers Ltd. ( unreported ) , 13 June 1991 , Drake J. |
| 5 | Webb v. Times Publishing Co . |
| 6 | The decision in Gillian has now been overruled by statute : see section 2(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974 ; Electrical , Electronic , Telecommunication and Plumbing Union v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1980 ] Q.B. 585 ; but that in no way detracts from the persuasive force of what was said by Uthwatt J. in Gillian . |
| 7 | Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1991 ] 4 All E.R. |
| 8 | Attorney-General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1992 ] 1 A.C. 191 ; [ 1991 ] 2 W.L.R. 994 ; [ 1991 ] 2 All E.R. |
| 9 | Lord Donaldson of Lymington M.R. considered In re O. and the decision of this House in Attorney-General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1992 ] 1 A.C. 191 upon which the plaintiffs relied . |
| 10 | A similar view appears to be taken by Lord Fraser of Tullybelton in the Rank case [ 1982 ] A.C. 380 , 446D ’ — where he said : ‘ A restriction by the court making the order would , no doubt , be effective to bind the party who obtained the order … ’ — ‘ ( d ) Since the decision of the House of Lords in Attorney-General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 191 it is to be taken as settled law that it is a contempt of court , as constituting an interference with the course of justice , for anyone , whether a party to the action or not , knowingly to thwart or subvert that purpose of an order of the court . |
| 11 | ‘ It is true that since the Rank Film case the House of Lords have extended the class of persons who would be bound by an order restricting the use of disclosed material : see Attorney General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1992 ] 1 A.C. 191 . |
| 12 | In agreement with the Court of Appeal , I do not consider that the order in this case leaves room for the extension to persons who are not parties of the doctrine expounded in Attorney-General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1992 ] 1 A.C. 191 . |
| 13 | Attorney-General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1992 ] 1 A.C. 191 ; [ 1991 ] 2 W.L.R. 994 ; [ 1991 ] 2 All E.R. |
| 14 | Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [ 1992 ] Q.B . |