Example sentences of "to be [vb pp] by [art] court " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Under Ord 50 , r 4A where under the rules a document is to be prepared by the court , that document may , if the proper officer so allows , be prepared by the plaintiff ( or applicant ) and , where a document is so produced the plaintiff is not required also to file a request but must provide a sufficient number of copies of the document for the court 's use .
2 ‘ The first question to be decided by the court is whether on the undisputed or incontrovertible facts there appears to be a question deserving fuller investigation and whether it might reasonably be held on the substantive hearing that it would be in the interests of the child for a ‘ residence order ’ to be made .
3 The questions which give rise to debate are rarely those which later have to be decided by the courts .
4 It is equally true that Lord Diplock has stated that the normal presumption is that Parliament intends questions of law to be decided by the courts , but his Lordship did not state that this was an irrebuttable presumption .
5 First , administrative tribunals or authorities were subject to the full rigours of the Anisminic judgment : the parliamentary intent was presumed , subject to a clear contrary indication , to be that questions of law were to be decided by the courts ; the distinction between errors within jurisdiction and errors going to jurisdiction was , for practical purposes , abolished , and any error of law would automatically result in the tribunal having asked itself the wrong question .
6 Even if the terms can be incorporated without such a notice , reference to the presence of the exclusions may well be relevant if the reasonableness of the terms has to be assessed by a court .
7 The House of Lords broke the deadlock by ordering an inquiry to be conducted by the court into the value of the reversions : it did not order the lessors to appoint a valuer .
8 The key to the theory is obviously the cogency of the argument that all issues of law are ‘ given , ’ to be determined by the courts .
9 In this connection it is worth noting that in another context , and in another part of the same Act , Parliament has made express provision for cases in which the suitability of particular accommodation is to be determined by the court in the course of ordinary litigation .
10 How widely this reservation is to be applied in practice has sooner or later to be defined by the Court of Justice .
11 Notice of service ( N 222 ) is to be sent by the court office to the plaintiff when a default summons is served by the court ( Ord 7 , r 21 ) .
12 Since 1979 the courts have ruled that review and appeal are available only where certain standard forms of contract need to be interpreted by the court or an award is plainly and seriously wrong : see Jaffe in ( 1989 ) Arbitration vol 55 , p184 .
13 If an expert clause is unclear , it may have to be clarified by the court .
14 It is , however , by no means certain that such a limitation was intended to be introduced by the Court of Appeal .
15 On issue the place , date and time of hearing are completed by the court and , unless service is to be effected by the court , a copy of the application duly sealed will be available for service to be effected by the party issuing the application .
16 In R v Inner London Juvenile Court , ex pG [ 1988 ] FCR 316 , Bush J held that the child 's welfare was a matter to be considered by the court and balanced against the risk of prejudice to the accused .
17 The potential liability of an expert who decides all disputes under a contract , both technical and non-technical , has yet to be considered by the courts .
18 For myself , I can see no relevant distinction between a case where a statute has conferred such final and conclusive jurisdiction and the case where the common law has for 300 years recognised that the visitor 's decision on questions of fact and law are final and conclusive and are not to be reviewed by the courts .
19 but the second way in which section fourteen arises is this slightly more oblique way , erm , it 's , it 's not really the question of competition law it 's more a question of administrative law or constitutional law , erm whether it arises on the question er , your Lordship will have to decide , but , if , if it does then we believe that our case is extremely strong , because what one is saying here is , is section fourteen a block to an article eighty five action , erm does it make it either virtually impossible or something lesser excessively difficult , er and we say er that that 's one aspect and two can we show it 's discriminatory , well we say first of all it is discriminatory because even on analysis of the bad faith argument they are putting in a claimant with an article eighty five case to an extraordinary length in order to make good his case , he first of all has to super declaration presumably that he is entitled to damages , but he ca n't get damages all he 's entitled to is the declaration if then do n't satisfy that claim by paying up and their not going to be ordered by the court to pay up because that 's a claim for damages and you ca n't have that then you have to sue them again on the basis of breach of bad faith , er no other provision in English law would go to that effect and that of course even , even that assumes whether rightly or wrongly and we say possibly wrongly that er , er the failure to comply with the judgment of the declaration would be bad faith within the meaning of the act , but even assuming it 's right it puts a plaintiff suing for breach of article eighty five in the worst position possible
20 He added that " it seems to me likely that it will fall to be resolved by the Court of Justice at the end of the day " .
21 Whether it continues to survive is simply another way of asking whether the traditional collateral fact doctrine will continue to be used by the courts .
22 If the plaintiff is under a disability settlement of the action has to be approved by the court under RSC Ord 80 , r13 or CCR Ord 10 , r10 ; so too if the claim is under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 as amended and more than one person is entitled to the damages even though no one is under a disability .
  Next page