Example sentences of "section [adj] of [art] [noun pl] [noun] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 One particular exception which may well apply is that contained in sections 8 of the Factors Act and 24 of the Sale of Goods Act .
2 Also note that , since Lee v. Butler , sections 9 of the Factors Act and 25 of the Sale of Goods Act have been amended .
3 The Assistant Director was acting under the authority of a Council resolution made under Section 79 of the Solicitors Act 1974 [ as substituted by Section 97 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 ] .
4 Under section 518 of the Companies Act 1985 if you are owed £750 or more by a company and it is overdue you can serve that company with a notice requesting payment within 21 days .
5 Some reliance was also placed on the fact that the 31 July bill did not comply with the requirements of section 67 of the Solicitors Act 1974 .
6 On 28 September 1989 the Company received notice pursuant to Section 376 of the Companies Act 1985 from Mr Noel Falconer and other shareholders of their intention to move the following resolutions at the Company 's Annual General Meeting in 1990 .
7 Yes , there is section 212 of the Companies Act .
8 On the contrary , for example , in In re Gold Co. ( 1879 ) 12 Ch.D. 77 ) in a case under section 115 of the Companies Act 1862 ( 25 & 26 Vict. c. 89 ) ( which enabled the court to summon any officer or any persons supposed to be capable of giving information concerning the transaction and trade dealings of the company ) , Sir George Jessel M.R. said , at p. 85 :
9 recognised the discretionary nature of the court 's powers under section 115 of the Companies Act 1862 .
10 Therefore since all the requirements in section 2 of the Factors Act were fulfilled , the innocent purchaser had good title to the tapestry .
11 Thus , a mercantile agent in possession of the registration book but not of the vehicle itself can not confer good title under section 2 of the Factors Act , Beverley Acceptances v. Oakely ( 1982 C.A. ) .
12 The mercantile agent then will not confer good title on X under section 2 of the Factors Act if he does not make the contract of sale with X until after he has returned the goods to their true owner , Beverley Acceptances v. Oakley .
13 Therefore the garage can not confer good title under section 2 of the Factors Act .
14 It was held that all the requirements of section 2 of the Factors Act were complied with including the requirement that the mercantile agent be in possession of goods or of the documents of title with the consent of ‘ the owner . ’
15 Mrs. Makanjuola was suing the police for damages for alleged sexual assault and buggery and to that end was seeking discovery of all relevant documents resulting from an investigation under section 49 of the Police Act 1964 and the police disciplinary proceedings which followed .
16 However , says Dr Collier , the infamous Section 118 of the Medicines Act means that the Department of Health 's Medicines Control Agency , unlike the American Food and Drugs Administration , ‘ can hide virtually all of their activities , including incompetence , behind a cloak of secrecy ’ .
17 The Department of Health has cultivated the myth for some years that section 118 of the Medicines Act is the only reason why it is prevented from explaining the decisions of the licensing authority in general or the recommendations of the Committee on Safety of Medicines , based on doctors ' reports of adverse reactions , in particular .
18 ( No. 2 ) [ 1970 ] Ch. 576 , 592 , Megarry J. referred to ‘ the unfettered discretion of the judge brought to bear upon any exercise of this extraordinary jurisdiction ’ under section 268 of the Companies Act 1948 which replaced section 115 of the Act of 1862 .
19 In my opinion , although there may be some difference in the wording of these sections , the position under section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 is broadly the same as that under section 268 of the Companies Act 1948 as explained by Buckley J. in In re Rolls Razor Ltd. [ 1968 ] 3 All E.R.
20 Surprisingly , the court seems never to have decided this ‘ territoriality ’ question in relation to the predecessor sections in the earlier Acts , such as sections 42 and 44 of the Bankruptcy Act 1914 , section 320 of the Companies Act 1948 and section 172 of the Law of Property Act 1925 .
21 Section 303 of the Companies Act 1985 provides that a company may by ordinary resolution remove a director before the expiration of his or her period of office and despite anything in the company 's articles or in any agreement between the company and the director .
22 The plaintiffs , a borough council , brought proceedings under section 222 of the Local Government Act 1972 and applied for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the defendants from using shop premises of theirs for trade on Sundays in breach of section 47 of the Shops Act 1950 The defendants resisted the claim against them on the ground , inter alia , that section 47 was in conflict with article 30 of the E.E.C .
23 This was an appeal by leave dated 18 November 1991 of the House of Lords ( Lord Bridge of Harwich , Lord Ackner and Lord Browne-Wilkinson ) by the appellants , Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council , from the judgment dated 30 April 1991 of the Court of Appeal ( Dillon , Mann and Beldam L.JJ. ) allowing the appeal of the respondents , Wickes Building Supplies Ltd. , from the judgment dated 14 May 1990 of Mervyn Davies J. granting the appellants an interlocutory injunction to restrain the respondents from trading on Sunday contrary to section 47 of the Shops Act 1950 , within the appellants ' administrative area .
24 In England and Wales , Sunday trading is prohibited by section 47 of the Shops Act 1950 which provides , subject to certain specified exceptions , that ‘ Every shop shall … be closed for the serving of customers on Sunday . ’
25 There can be no doubt , since the decision of this House in Stoke-on-Trent City Council v. B. & Q. ( Retail ) Ltd. [ 1984 ] A.C. 754 , that a local authority has power , in appropriate circumstances , to proceed in its own name by way of injunction to restrain infringements of section 47 of the Shops Act 1950 .
26 On the face of these two statutory provisions , it appears that proceedings in its own name by way of injunction are open to a local authority in order to secure observance of section 47 of the Shops Act .
27 On the other hand it was the submission of Mr. Collins for Wickes that the function of the undertaking in damages required of the council by the Court of Appeal was to protect the right of Wickes which flowed from the direct effect of article 30 , in the event of the European Court of Justice holding , on the reference to it of the Stoke-on-Trent case [ 1991 ] Ch. 48 , that section 47 of the Shops Act 1950 was invalid because it was inconsistent with article 30 .
28 But , having regard to the passage from the judgment of the European Court in the Francovich case which I have just quoted , it is in my opinion right that in the present case your Lordships should proceed on the basis that if , on the reference to it in the Stoke-on-Trent case [ 1991 ] Ch. 48 , the court should hold that section 47 of the Shops Act 1950 is invalid as being in conflict with article 30 of the Treaty , the United Kingdom may be obliged to make good damage caused to individuals by the breach of article 30 for which it is responsible .
29 In so deciding , he had to take into account the fact that it was plain that Wickes would , unless restrained , continue to act in contravention of section 47 of the Shops Act 1950 ; and that , in practical terms , proceedings by way of injunction were the only means open to the council to perform its duty to enforce the provisions of section 47 .
30 On 30 March 1992 the local authority sought and were granted leave under section 100 of the Children Act 1989 to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court to ‘ determine whether artificial ventilation and/or other life-saving measures should be given to the minor if he suffers a life-threatening event . ’
  Next page