| No | Pattern | Freq | Relations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | was [vb pp] as [art] | 2960 |
|
| 2 | was [vb pp] as a | 1782 |
|
| 3 | was [vb pp] as the | 777 |
|
| 4 | was seen as [art] | 402 |
|
| 5 | was [vb pp] as an | 395 |
|
| 6 | was used as [art] | 222 |
|
| 7 | was regarded as [art] | 192 |
|
| 8 | was known as [art] | 142 |
|
| 9 | was described as [art] | 125 |
|
| 10 | was defined as [art] | 63 |
|
| 11 | was appointed as [art] | 52 |
|
| 12 | was hailed as [art] | 45 |
|
| 13 | was established as [art] | 45 |
|
| 14 | was chosen as [art] | 44 |
|
| 15 | was perceived as [art] | 37 |
|
| 16 | was intended as [art] | 37 |
|
| 17 | was taken as [art] | 35 |
|
| 18 | was identified as [art] | 34 |
|
| 19 | was treated as [art] | 34 |
|
| 20 | was accepted as [art] | 33 |
|
| 21 | was designed as [art] | 33 |
|
| 22 | was named as [art] | 32 |
|
| 23 | was calculated as [art] | 31 |
|
| 24 | was employed as [art] | 31 |
|
| 25 | was built as [art] | 30 |
|
| 26 | was elected as [art] | 29 |
|
| 27 | was interpreted as [art] | 27 |
|
| 28 | was viewed as [art] | 24 |
|
| 29 | was presented as [art] | 24 |
|
| 30 | was recognised as [art] | 22 |
|
