No | Pattern | Freq | Relations |
---|---|---|---|
1 | is [vb pp] that in | 81 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | is estimated that [prep] | 18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | is [vb pp] that at | 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | is [vb pp] that on | 14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | is [vb pp] that for | 14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | is hoped that [prep] | 14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | is said that [prep] | 13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | is [vb pp] that by | 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | is assumed that [prep] | 10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | is suggested that [prep] | 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | is [vb pp] that during | 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | is reported that [prep] | 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | is thought that [prep] | 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | is [vb pp] that within | 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | is submitted that [prep] | 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | is envisaged that [prep] | 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | is accepted that [prep] | 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | is known that [prep] | 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | is recognised that [prep] | 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | is recommended that [prep] | 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | is claimed that [prep] | 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | is argued that [prep] | 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |