| No | Pattern | Freq | Relations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | was seen as | 226 |
|
| 2 | was described as | 164 |
|
| 3 | was regarded as | 121 |
|
| 4 | was quoted as | 115 |
|
| 5 | was reported as | 80 |
|
| 6 | was appointed as | 47 |
|
| 7 | was diagnosed as | 41 |
|
| 8 | was named as | 36 |
|
| 9 | was replaced as | 30 |
|
| 10 | was defined as | 29 |
|
| 11 | was recorded as | 26 |
|
| 12 | was chosen as | 23 |
|
| 13 | was confirmed as | 22 |
|
| 14 | was elected as | 22 |
|
| 15 | was given as | 21 |
|
| 16 | was interpreted as | 20 |
|
| 17 | was perceived as | 20 |
|
| 18 | was identified as | 19 |
|
| 19 | was accepted as | 19 |
|
| 20 | was taken as | 19 |
|
| 21 | was viewed as | 18 |
|
| 22 | was performed as | 17 |
|
| 23 | was classified as | 16 |
|
| 24 | was recognised as | 14 |
|
| 25 | was used as | 14 |
|
| 26 | was attacked as | 14 |
|
| 27 | was dismissed as | 14 |
|
| 28 | was presented as | 13 |
|
| 29 | was killed as | 10 |
|
| 30 | was re-elected as | 10 |
|
